unity-review-quality
Senior Unity Developer quality review. Deep-dives into a Unity project, reviews everything against best practices, and produces a comprehensive HTML report document. Read-only — never modifies any project files. Covers: architecture, code quality, performance, Unity best practices, project health, security, testing, asset management, and technical debt. Use when: (1) Full project quality audit, (2) Pre-release readiness check, (3) Technical debt assessment, (4) Onboarding review to understand project health, (5) Periodic quality gate evaluation, (6) Post-mortem quality analysis. Triggers: 'review quality', 'quality audit', 'project review', 'quality check', 'project health', 'best practices review', 'code audit', 'technical debt review', 'quality report', 'full review', 'project audit'.
Best use case
unity-review-quality is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Senior Unity Developer quality review. Deep-dives into a Unity project, reviews everything against best practices, and produces a comprehensive HTML report document. Read-only — never modifies any project files. Covers: architecture, code quality, performance, Unity best practices, project health, security, testing, asset management, and technical debt. Use when: (1) Full project quality audit, (2) Pre-release readiness check, (3) Technical debt assessment, (4) Onboarding review to understand project health, (5) Periodic quality gate evaluation, (6) Post-mortem quality analysis. Triggers: 'review quality', 'quality audit', 'project review', 'quality check', 'project health', 'best practices review', 'code audit', 'technical debt review', 'quality report', 'full review', 'project audit'.
Teams using unity-review-quality should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/unity-review-quality/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How unity-review-quality Compares
| Feature / Agent | unity-review-quality | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Senior Unity Developer quality review. Deep-dives into a Unity project, reviews everything against best practices, and produces a comprehensive HTML report document. Read-only — never modifies any project files. Covers: architecture, code quality, performance, Unity best practices, project health, security, testing, asset management, and technical debt. Use when: (1) Full project quality audit, (2) Pre-release readiness check, (3) Technical debt assessment, (4) Onboarding review to understand project health, (5) Periodic quality gate evaluation, (6) Post-mortem quality analysis. Triggers: 'review quality', 'quality audit', 'project review', 'quality check', 'project health', 'best practices review', 'code audit', 'technical debt review', 'quality report', 'full review', 'project audit'.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
Cursor vs Codex for AI Workflows
Compare Cursor and Codex for AI coding workflows, repository assistance, debugging, refactoring, and reusable developer skills.
SKILL.md Source
# Unity Quality Reviewer **Persona**: Senior Unity Developer with 15 years experience. Reviews the entire project with zero tolerance for anti-patterns, performance traps, and architectural debt. Produces a comprehensive report. **Never modifies any project file.** **Input**: Unity project path (or current working directory) ## Output Comprehensive HTML quality report. Read-only — never modifies project files. ## Absolute Rules - **READ-ONLY**: Never edit, create, or delete any project file. Only create the report document. - **EVIDENCE-BASED**: Every finding must cite file:line. No speculative findings. - **SEVERITY-DRIVEN**: Classify every finding. Critical issues first. - **ACTIONABLE**: Every finding must include a concrete fix recommendation. ## Severity Classification & Grading See [grading.md](references/grading.md) for severity levels (Critical/High/Medium/Low) and project grading criteria (A–F). ## Load References (ALL — full audit) Load ALL reference checklists before starting: - [ARCHITECTURE_CHECKLIST.md](references/ARCHITECTURE_CHECKLIST.md) — architecture, design patterns, SOLID, coupling - [PERFORMANCE_CHECKLIST.md](references/PERFORMANCE_CHECKLIST.md) — CPU, GPU, memory, GC, assets - [CODE_QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md](references/CODE_QUALITY_CHECKLIST.md) — code quality, conventions, anti-patterns, testing - [UNITY_BEST_PRACTICES.md](references/UNITY_BEST_PRACTICES.md) — lifecycle, serialization, scenes, prefabs, assets - [PROJECT_HEALTH_CHECKLIST.md](references/PROJECT_HEALTH_CHECKLIST.md) — project structure, settings, packages, build config, security ## Workflow & Review Principles See [workflow.md](references/workflow.md) for the 7-step review workflow (discovery → investigation → report → summary) and review principles.
Related Skills
third-party-risk-review
Assess vendor and business associate risk for healthcare organizations by evaluating BAA compliance, security posture, data handling practices, regulatory compliance, and financial stability of third parties with access to protected health information. Use when onboarding new vendors, conducting periodic BA risk assessments, evaluating cloud and SaaS providers, investigating vendor security incidents, negotiating BAAs, or preparing for OCR audit of business associate management.
testing-quality
Plans and executes comprehensive testing strategy across frontend, backend, and AI tiers. Activates when writing tests, testing features, setting up test infrastructure, checking coverage, running E2E tests, or performance testing. Does not handle writing production code (backend-developer or frontend-developer), vulnerability/security review (security), or infrastructure deployment (devops).
technical-review
No description provided.
security-reviewer
Use when conducting security audits, reviewing code for vulnerabilities, or analyzing infrastructure security. Invoke for SAST scans, penetration testing, DevSecOps practices, cloud security reviews.
security-review
Run a targeted security audit on specified files or modules. Uses OWASP-informed checks, dependency vulnerability scanning, and auth/input validation review. Use for security audits, vulnerability checks, or before deploying sensitive code. Keywords: security, audit, vulnerability, OWASP, CVE, secrets, injection, XSS, auth, authentication, authorization
security-review-pr
PR/branch security review focused on HIGH-CONFIDENCE vulnerabilities with minimal false positives. Uses git diff analysis and sub-task parallelization.
security-review-audit
Full codebase security audit with OWASP Top 10 guidance, language-specific patterns, checklists, and fix examples. Use for comprehensive audits split by module/area.
reviewing-security
Executes security design and implementation reviews with threat modeling, OWASP-based checks, and risk-ranked remediation guidance. Activates when reviewing security, threat modeling, checking for vulnerabilities, auditing auth flows, performing OWASP reviews, or assessing security posture. Does not handle code quality or test coverage (code-reviewer), writing production code (backend-developer or frontend-developer), or infrastructure deployment (devops).
reviewer
Activate when reviewing code, before committing, after committing, or before merging a PR. Activate when user asks to review, audit, check for security issues, or find regressions. Analyzes code for logic errors, regressions, edge cases, security issues, and test gaps. Fixes findings AUTOMATICALLY. Required at process skill quality gates.
quality
Code quality assurance strategies. Parent skill for quality-related skills: security (security review) and debug (systematic debugging).
quality-standards
Overview of protected quality thresholds and quick reference for all quality tools. Use when you need to understand quality metrics, run comprehensive quality checks, or learn which specialized skill to use. For specific issues, use dedicated skills (deptrac-fixer for Deptrac, complexity-management for PHPInsights, testing-workflow for coverage).
preen-review-instructions
Audit and update code review instructions (REVIEW.md, .gemini/INSTRUCTIONS.md)