quality

Senior Unity Developer quality review. Deep-dives into a Unity project, reviews everything against best practices, and produces a comprehensive HTML report document. Read-only — never modifies any project files. Covers: architecture, code quality, performance, Unity best practices, project health, security, testing, asset management, and technical debt. Use when: (1) Full project quality audit, (2) Pre-release readiness check, (3) Technical debt assessment, (4) Onboarding review to understand project health, (5) Periodic quality gate evaluation, (6) Post-mortem quality analysis. Triggers: 'review quality', 'quality audit', 'project review', 'quality check', 'project health', 'best practices review', 'code audit', 'technical debt review', 'quality report', 'full review', 'project audit'.

Plans and executes comprehensive testing strategy across frontend, backend, and AI tiers. Activates when writing tests, testing features, setting up test infrastructure, checking coverage, running E2E tests, or performance testing. Does not handle writing production code (backend-developer or frontend-developer), vulnerability/security review (security), or infrastructure deployment (devops).

Overview of protected quality thresholds and quick reference for all quality tools. Use when you need to understand quality metrics, run comprehensive quality checks, or learn which specialized skill to use. For specific issues, use dedicated skills (deptrac-fixer for Deptrac, complexity-management for PHPInsights, testing-workflow for coverage).

Automatically activated when user asks about test quality, code coverage, test reliability, test maintainability, or wants to analyze their test suite. Provides framework-agnostic test quality analysis and improvement recommendations. Does NOT provide framework-specific patterns - use jest-testing or playwright-testing for those.

Document control system management for medical device QMS. Covers document numbering, version control, change management, and 21 CFR Part 11 compliance. Use for document control procedures, change control workflow, document numbering, version management, electronic signature compliance, or regulatory documentation review.

Synthesize all quality assessments (risk, test-design, traceability, NFR) into evidence-based gate decision (PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL/WAIVED) with comprehensive rationale. Generates both YAML (CI/CD) and Markdown (human review) reports with action items. Use during final quality review to make go/no-go deployment decisions based on comprehensive quality evidence.

Operate the "plan quality evaluation for civic participation platforms" capability in production for plan quality evaluation for civic participation platforms workflows. Use when mission execution explicitly requires this capability and outcomes must be reproducible, policy-gated, and handoff-ready.

A protocol for performing a deep code quality analysis using static analysis tools and formatting. It covers C++ (cppcheck) and React/JavaScript (ESLint).

Ensures code quality through comprehensive checks including TDD practices, lint/test/build validation, and prevention of common mistakes. Use after completing implementations, fixing bugs, refactoring, or before committing code.

Generate and interpret quality reports from FASTQ files using FastQC and MultiQC. Assess per-base quality, adapter content, GC bias, duplication levels, and overrepresented sequences. Use when performing initial QC on raw sequencing data or validating preprocessing results.

Enforce lint, formatting, typing, testing, and security hygiene across the ATFT-GAT-FAN codebase.

Use when assessing codebase architecture and you feel pressure to soften critique, lead with strengths, or frame problems diplomatically - provides evidence-based critical assessment resisting relationship and economic pressures