ad-spend-allocator

Analyze multi-channel ad performance data and recommend budget reallocation across Google, Meta, LinkedIn, and other paid channels. Identifies over-indexed and under-indexed channels based on CAC, conversion rates, and funnel stage coverage. Produces specific dollar-amount shift recommendations.

381 stars

Best use case

ad-spend-allocator is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Analyze multi-channel ad performance data and recommend budget reallocation across Google, Meta, LinkedIn, and other paid channels. Identifies over-indexed and under-indexed channels based on CAC, conversion rates, and funnel stage coverage. Produces specific dollar-amount shift recommendations.

Teams using ad-spend-allocator should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/ad-spend-allocator/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gooseworks-ai/goose-skills/main/skills/composites/ad-spend-allocator/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/ad-spend-allocator/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How ad-spend-allocator Compares

Feature / Agentad-spend-allocatorStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Analyze multi-channel ad performance data and recommend budget reallocation across Google, Meta, LinkedIn, and other paid channels. Identifies over-indexed and under-indexed channels based on CAC, conversion rates, and funnel stage coverage. Produces specific dollar-amount shift recommendations.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# Ad Spend Allocator

Take performance data from multiple ad channels and figure out where your next dollar should go. This skill compares channels on equal terms, identifies where you're over-spending vs under-spending relative to results, and produces a concrete budget reallocation plan.

**Core principle:** Most startups either spread budget too thin across channels (no channel gets enough to learn) or dump everything into one channel (missing cheaper opportunities elsewhere). This skill finds the right distribution.

## When to Use

- "How should I split my ad budget?"
- "Should I spend more on Google or Meta?"
- "Reallocate my ad spend across channels"
- "Where am I getting the best return?"
- "I have $X/month for ads — how should I distribute it?"

## Phase 0: Intake

1. **Total monthly ad budget** — Current or planned
2. **Channels currently running** — Google Ads, Meta Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Twitter/X Ads, TikTok Ads, other
3. **Performance data per channel** — For each active channel:
   - Monthly spend
   - Impressions
   - Clicks / CTR
   - Conversions (and conversion type: demo, trial, purchase)
   - CPA or CAC
   - Revenue attributed (if available)
   - ROAS (if available)
4. **Primary conversion goal** — Demos / Trials / Purchases / MQLs
5. **Funnel data** (if available):
   - Lead → MQL rate
   - MQL → SQL rate
   - SQL → Close rate
   - Average deal size
6. **Channels you're considering but haven't tried** — Want to test new channels?
7. **Constraints** — Minimum spend on any channel? Platform you must stay on?

## Phase 1: Channel Normalization

### Apples-to-Apples Comparison

Normalize all channels to the same metrics:

| Channel | Monthly Spend | Impressions | Clicks | CTR | CPC | Conversions | Conv Rate | CPA | ROAS | CAC* |
|---------|-------------|------------|--------|-----|-----|-------------|----------|-----|------|------|
| Google Search | $[X] | [N] | [N] | [X%] | $[X] | [N] | [X%] | $[X] | [X] | $[X] |
| Google Display | ... | | | | | | | | | |
| Meta (FB/IG) | ... | | | | | | | | | |
| LinkedIn | ... | | | | | | | | | |
| [Other] | ... | | | | | | | | | |
| **Total** | $[X] | | | | | [N] | | $[X] avg | [X] avg | $[X] avg |

*CAC = Full customer acquisition cost if funnel data provided (CPA × close-rate adjustment)

### Funnel-Adjusted CAC (If Funnel Data Available)

```
Channel CAC = CPA ÷ (MQL rate × SQL rate × Close rate)
```

This reveals which channels produce leads that actually close, not just convert.

## Phase 2: Channel Efficiency Analysis

### 2A: Efficiency Ranking

| Rank | Channel | CPA | Funnel-Adj CAC | Share of Spend | Share of Conversions | Efficiency Index |
|------|---------|-----|---------------|----------------|---------------------|-----------------|
| 1 | [Channel] | $[X] | $[X] | [X%] | [X%] | [Conv share ÷ Spend share] |

**Efficiency Index:**
- **> 1.0** = Under-invested (getting more than its share of conversions)
- **= 1.0** = Proportional (fair share)
- **< 1.0** = Over-invested (getting less than its share)

### 2B: Marginal Return Analysis

For each channel, estimate if additional spend would yield proportional returns:

| Channel | Current CPA | Impression Share / Saturation Signal | Marginal Return Estimate |
|---------|-------------|-------------------------------------|------------------------|
| Google Search | $[X] | [X%] impression share — room to grow | Likely positive |
| Meta | $[X] | Frequency [X] — audience may be saturated | Diminishing |
| LinkedIn | $[X] | Low volume — limited targeting pool | Ceiling soon |

### 2C: Funnel Stage Coverage

| Funnel Stage | Channels Covering It | Current Spend | Gap? |
|-------------|---------------------|--------------|------|
| **Awareness** (top) | [Meta Display, YouTube] | $[X] | [Yes/No] |
| **Consideration** (mid) | [Google Search, Meta retargeting] | $[X] | [Yes/No] |
| **Decision** (bottom) | [Google Brand, Google Search] | $[X] | [Yes/No] |
| **Retargeting** | [Meta, Google Display] | $[X] | [Yes/No] |

## Phase 3: Reallocation Recommendations

### 3A: Budget Shift Table

| Channel | Current Spend | Recommended Spend | Change | Reasoning |
|---------|-------------|------------------|--------|-----------|
| Google Search | $[X] | $[Y] | +$[Z] | [Lowest CPA, room to scale] |
| Meta | $[X] | $[Y] | -$[Z] | [Audience saturation, frequency too high] |
| LinkedIn | $[X] | $[Y] | $0 | [Maintain — niche but valuable] |
| [New channel] | $0 | $[Y] | +$[Y] | [Test budget — competitors succeeding here] |
| **Total** | $[X] | $[X] | $0 | Budget-neutral reallocation |

### 3B: Scenario Modeling

**Scenario 1: Conservative shift (+/- 20%)**
- Expected conversions: [N] (currently [N]) = [X%] improvement
- Expected blended CPA: $[X] (currently $[X])
- Risk: Low

**Scenario 2: Aggressive shift (+/- 40%)**
- Expected conversions: [N] = [X%] improvement
- Expected blended CPA: $[X]
- Risk: Medium — less data on scaled channels

**Scenario 3: Budget increase to $[Y]/mo**
- Recommended allocation: [table]
- Expected conversions: [N]
- New channels to test: [list]

## Phase 4: Output Format

```markdown
# Ad Spend Allocation — [Product/Client] — [DATE]

Total monthly budget: $[X]
Active channels: [list]
Period analyzed: [date range]

---

## Current State

| Channel | Spend | % of Budget | Conversions | CPA | Efficiency |
|---------|-------|------------|-------------|-----|-----------|
| [Channel] | $[X] | [X%] | [N] | $[X] | [Over/Under/Fair] |

**Blended CPA:** $[X]
**Total conversions:** [N]

---

## Recommended Reallocation

| Channel | Current | Recommended | Change | Why |
|---------|---------|------------|--------|-----|
| [Channel] | $[X] | $[Y] | [+/-$Z] | [1-line reason] |

**Projected impact:**
- Conversions: [N] → [N] (+[X%])
- Blended CPA: $[X] → $[Y] (-[X%])

---

## Funnel Stage Coverage

[Coverage map with gaps identified]

---

## New Channel Recommendations

### [Channel Name]
- **Why test:** [Reasoning]
- **Recommended test budget:** $[X]/mo for [X weeks]
- **Success criteria:** CPA < $[X]
- **Competitors using it:** [Yes/No — who]

---

## Implementation Plan

### Week 1: Quick Shifts
- [ ] Reduce [Channel] from $[X] to $[Y]
- [ ] Increase [Channel] from $[X] to $[Y]
- [ ] Set up [New Channel] test campaign

### Week 2-4: Monitor
- [ ] Track CPA shifts on scaled channels
- [ ] Watch for diminishing returns signals
- [ ] Evaluate new channel performance

### Month 2: Re-evaluate
- [ ] Run this analysis again with new data
- [ ] Adjust allocations based on actual results
```

Save to `clients/<client-name>/ads/spend-allocation-[YYYY-MM-DD].md`.

## Cost

| Component | Cost |
|-----------|------|
| Data analysis | Free (LLM reasoning) |
| Statistical modeling | Free |
| **Total** | **Free** |

## Tools Required

- No external tools needed — pure reasoning skill
- User provides multi-channel performance data

## Trigger Phrases

- "How should I allocate my ad budget?"
- "Should I spend more on Google or Meta?"
- "Reallocate my ad spend"
- "Where am I getting the best ROAS?"
- "Optimize my multi-channel ad budget"

Related Skills

competitor-monitoring-system

381
from gooseworks-ai/goose-skills

Set up and run ongoing competitive intelligence monitoring for a client. Tracks competitor content, ads, reviews, social, and product moves.

client-packet-engine

381
from gooseworks-ai/goose-skills

Batch client packet generator. Takes company names/URLs, runs intelligence + strategy generation, presents strategies for human selection, executes selected strategies in pitch-packet mode (no live campaigns or paid enrichment), and packages into local delivery packets.

client-package-notion

381
from gooseworks-ai/goose-skills

Package all work done for a client into a shareable Notion page with subpages and Google Sheets. Reads the client's folder (strategies, campaigns, content, leads, notes) and builds a structured Notion workspace the client can browse. Lead list CSVs are uploaded to Google Sheets and linked from the Notion pages. Use when you want to deliver work to a client in a polished, navigable format.

client-package-local

381
from gooseworks-ai/goose-skills

Package all work done for a client into a local filesystem delivery package with .md files and Google Sheets. Reads the client's folder (strategies, campaigns, content, leads, notes) and builds a structured directory with dated deliverables. Lead lists are uploaded to Google Sheets and linked from the markdown files. Use when you want to deliver work to a client in a polished, navigable format without requiring Notion.

client-onboarding

381
from gooseworks-ai/goose-skills

Full client onboarding: intelligence gathering, synthesis into Client Intelligence Package, and growth strategy generation. Phases 1-3 of the Client Launch Playbook.

lead-discovery

381
from gooseworks-ai/goose-skills

Orchestrator that runs first for lead generation requests. Gathers business context via website analysis or questions, identifies competitors, builds ICP, and routes to signal skills with pre-filled inputs.

serp-feature-sniper

381
from gooseworks-ai/goose-skills

Analyze SERP features per keyword (featured snippets, PAA, video carousels, knowledge panels, image packs) and produce optimized content structures to win them. Identifies which features are winnable, who currently holds them, and exactly how to format your content to steal them.

search-ad-keyword-architect

381
from gooseworks-ai/goose-skills

Deep keyword research for paid search. Analyzes competitor SEO keywords, review language, Reddit/community terminology, and existing site content to build a keyword architecture: branded vs non-branded, funnel stage mapping, match type recommendations, and estimated competition tiers. Use before building a Google Ads campaign or to audit an existing one.

sales-performance-review

381
from gooseworks-ai/goose-skills

Periodic sales performance review composite. Aggregates ALL sales initiatives taken in a given period — outbound campaigns, inbound efforts, events, partnerships, content, referrals — and measures the impact of each on pipeline and revenue. Produces a team-presentable report covering initiative-level performance, cross-initiative comparisons, pipeline attribution, what's working, what's not, and where to invest next. Tool-agnostic — pulls data from any combination of CRM, outreach tools, and tracking systems.

qbr-deck-builder

381
from gooseworks-ai/goose-skills

Pull customer usage highlights, support history, feature adoption, NPS/CSAT data, and ROI metrics into a structured QBR deck outline with slide-by-slide content. Outputs markdown slide content ready for HTML slides or Google Slides. Designed for CS teams at seed/Series A who run QBRs but don't have time to build decks from scratch.

customer-story-builder

381
from gooseworks-ai/goose-skills

Take raw customer inputs — interview transcripts, survey responses, Slack quotes, support tickets, review excerpts — and generate a structured case study draft with problem/solution/result narrative, pull-quotes, metric callouts, and multi-format outputs (full case study, one-pager, social proof snippet, sales deck slide). Pure reasoning skill. Use when a product marketing team has customer signal but no time to write the story.

content-repurposer

381
from gooseworks-ai/goose-skills

Take a long-form asset (blog post, webinar, podcast, LinkedIn article) and generate 10+ derivative pieces ready to publish: LinkedIn posts, tweets/X threads, email snippets, short-form hooks, and pull-quotes. Pure reasoning skill — no scripts, no scraping. Use when a founder or marketer has created one piece of content and needs to distribute it across multiple channels without writing each variant from scratch.