ui-review

Review UI code for StyleSeed design-system compliance, accessibility, mobile ergonomics, spacing discipline, and implementation quality.

38 stars

Best use case

ui-review is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Review UI code for StyleSeed design-system compliance, accessibility, mobile ergonomics, spacing discipline, and implementation quality.

Teams using ui-review should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/ui-review/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lingxling/awesome-skills-cn/main/antigravity-awesome-skills/plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/ui-review/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/ui-review/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How ui-review Compares

Feature / Agentui-reviewStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Review UI code for StyleSeed design-system compliance, accessibility, mobile ergonomics, spacing discipline, and implementation quality.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

Related Guides

SKILL.md Source

# UI Review

## Overview

Part of [StyleSeed](https://github.com/bitjaru/styleseed), this skill audits UI code against the Toss seed's conventions instead of reviewing it as generic frontend work. It focuses on design-token discipline, component ergonomics, accessibility, mobile readiness, typography, and spacing consistency.

## When to Use
- Use when a component or page should follow the StyleSeed Toss design language
- Use when reviewing a UI-heavy PR for consistency and design-system violations
- Use when the output looks "mostly fine" but feels off in subtle ways
- Use when you need a structured review with concrete fixes

## Review Checklist

### Design Tokens

- no hardcoded hex colors when semantic tokens exist
- no improvised shadow values when tokenized shadows exist
- no arbitrary radius choices outside the system scale
- no random spacing values that break the seed rhythm

### Component Conventions

- uses the project's class merge helper
- supports `className` extension when appropriate
- uses the agreed typing pattern
- avoids wrapper components that only forward one class string
- reuses existing primitives before inventing new ones

### Accessibility

- touch targets large enough for mobile
- visible keyboard focus states
- labels and `aria-*` attributes where needed
- adequate color contrast
- reduced-motion respect for animation

### Mobile UX

- no horizontal overflow
- safe-area handling where relevant
- readable text sizes
- thumb-friendly interaction spacing
- bottom nav or sticky actions do not obscure content

### Typography and Spacing

- uses the system type hierarchy
- display and headings are not overly loose
- body text remains readable
- spacing follows the seed grid instead of arbitrary values

## Output Format

Return:
1. A verdict: Pass, Needs Improvement, or Fail
2. A prioritized list of issues with file and line references when available
3. Concrete fixes for each issue
4. Any open questions where the design intent is ambiguous

## Best Practices

- Review against the seed, not against personal taste
- Separate stylistic drift from real usability or accessibility bugs
- Prefer actionable diffs over abstract criticism
- Call out duplication when an existing component already solves the problem

## Additional Resources

- [StyleSeed repository](https://github.com/bitjaru/styleseed)
- [Source skill](https://github.com/bitjaru/styleseed/blob/main/seeds/toss/.claude/skills/ui-review/SKILL.md)

## Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

Related Skills

peer-review

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.

literature-review

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).

vibers-code-review

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

Human review workflow for AI-generated GitHub projects with spec-based feedback, security review, and follow-up PRs from the Vibers service.

requesting-code-review

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

receiving-code-review

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

Code review requires technical evaluation, not emotional performance.

performance-testing-review-multi-agent-review

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

Use when working with performance testing review multi agent review

performance-testing-review-ai-review

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

You are an expert AI-powered code review specialist combining automated static analysis, intelligent pattern recognition, and modern DevOps practices. Leverage AI tools (GitHub Copilot, Qodo, GPT-5, C

lightning-architecture-review

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

Review Bitcoin Lightning Network protocol designs, compare channel factory approaches, and analyze Layer 2 scaling tradeoffs. Covers trust models, on-chain footprint, consensus requirements, HTLC/PTLC compatibility, liveness, and watchtower support.

gha-security-review

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

Find exploitable vulnerabilities in GitHub Actions workflows. Every finding MUST include a concrete exploitation scenario — if you can't build the attack, don't report it.

gh-review-requests

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

Fetch unread GitHub notifications for open PRs where review is requested from a specified team or opened by a team member. Use when asked to "find PRs I need to review", "show my review requests", "what needs my review", "fetch GitHub review requests", or "check team review queue".

fix-review

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

Verify fix commits address audit findings without new bugs

error-debugging-multi-agent-review

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

Use when working with error debugging multi agent review