vibers-code-review

Human review workflow for AI-generated GitHub projects with spec-based feedback, security review, and follow-up PRs from the Vibers service.

38 stars

Best use case

vibers-code-review is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Human review workflow for AI-generated GitHub projects with spec-based feedback, security review, and follow-up PRs from the Vibers service.

Teams using vibers-code-review should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/vibers-code-review/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lingxling/awesome-skills-cn/main/antigravity-awesome-skills/plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills-claude/skills/vibers-code-review/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/vibers-code-review/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How vibers-code-review Compares

Feature / Agentvibers-code-reviewStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Human review workflow for AI-generated GitHub projects with spec-based feedback, security review, and follow-up PRs from the Vibers service.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

Related Guides

SKILL.md Source

# Vibers — Human Code Review for AI-Generated Projects

You push code. We review it against your spec, fix issues, and send a PR.

## When to Use
Use this skill when:

- You want human review for AI-generated code pushed to GitHub
- You have a project spec and want reviewers to check implementation against it
- You want review feedback delivered as a follow-up PR with suggested fixes
- You are comfortable granting the Vibers service collaborator access to the repository

## Quick Start (3 steps)

### Step 1. Add collaborator

Go to your repo → Settings → Collaborators → Add **`marsiandeployer`**

### Step 2. Add GitHub Action

Create `.github/workflows/vibers.yml`:

```yaml
name: Vibers Code Review
on:
  push:
    branches: [main]

jobs:
  review:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
        with:
          fetch-depth: 2
      - uses: marsiandeployer/vibers-action@v1
        with:
          spec_url: 'https://docs.google.com/document/d/YOUR_SPEC_ID/edit'
          telegram_contact: '@your_telegram'
```

| Parameter | What it does |
|-----------|-------------|
| `spec_url` | Link to your spec (Google Doc, Notion, etc.). **Must be publicly accessible** (or "anyone with the link can view"). Without access to spec, review is impossible. |
| `review_scope` | `full` (default), `security`, or `spec-compliance` |
| `telegram_contact` | Your Telegram — we'll message you when review is ready |

### Step 3. Add commit rules to your AI agent

Add this block to your project's `CLAUDE.md`, `.cursorrules`, or `AGENTS.md`:

```markdown
## Commit messages

Every commit MUST include a "How to test" section in the body:
- Live URL to open and verify the change
- Step-by-step what to click/check
- Test credentials if login is required
- Expected result for each step

Example:
  feat: Add user registration form

  How to test:
  - Open https://myapp.vercel.app/register
  - Fill in email/password, submit
  - Check that confirmation email arrives
  - Try submitting with invalid email — should show error
  - Login: test@example.com / demo123
```

Without "How to test" the reviewer has to guess what to verify, and the review takes longer.

**Done.** Now every push triggers a notification. You'll get a PR with fixes, usually within 24 hours.

## What Happens After Setup

1. You push code → GitHub Action sends us the commit details
2. We read your spec and review changed files
3. We fix issues directly in code and submit a PR
4. You review the PR, merge or comment

We check: spec compliance, security (OWASP top 10), AI hallucinations (fake APIs/imports), logic bugs, UI issues.

We don't check: code style (use ESLint/Prettier), performance benchmarks, full QA (use Playwright/Cypress).

## Limitations

- Requires a GitHub repository and adding `marsiandeployer` as a collaborator
- The referenced spec must be accessible to the review workflow
- The service is not a replacement for full QA, benchmark testing, or local security review
- Turnaround depends on the external Vibers review service

## Pricing

| Plan | Rate | Details |
|------|------|---------|
| **Promo** | $1/hour | Full review + PRs with fixes. We ask for honest feedback in return. |
| **Standard** | $15/hour | Full review + security audit + priority turnaround. |

No subscriptions. No contracts. Pay per review.

## Feedback & Support

Send feedback directly from your agent:

```bash
curl -X POST https://vibers.onout.org/feedback \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"message": "Your question or issue", "repo": "https://github.com/you/your-repo"}'
```

Both `message` and `repo` are required. Response: `{"status": "accepted"}`.

Contacts:
- Telegram: [@onoutnoxon](https://t.me/onoutnoxon)
- Moltbook: [moltbook.com](https://moltbook.com) — user **noxon**
- GitHub: [marsiandeployer](https://github.com/marsiandeployer)

## FAQ

**Do I need an API key?**
No. Add collaborator + action, that's it.

**What languages?**
JS/TS, Python, React, Next.js, Django, Flask, and more. If it's on GitHub, we review it.

**What if I disagree with a fix?**
Comment on the PR. We discuss and adjust.

**Can I use this without GitHub?**
Yes — write to Telegram with your code and spec.

Related Skills

peer-review

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.

literature-review

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).

ui-review

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

Review UI code for StyleSeed design-system compliance, accessibility, mobile ergonomics, spacing discipline, and implementation quality.

requesting-code-review

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

receiving-code-review

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

Code review requires technical evaluation, not emotional performance.

performance-testing-review-multi-agent-review

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

Use when working with performance testing review multi agent review

performance-testing-review-ai-review

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

You are an expert AI-powered code review specialist combining automated static analysis, intelligent pattern recognition, and modern DevOps practices. Leverage AI tools (GitHub Copilot, Qodo, GPT-5, C

lightning-architecture-review

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

Review Bitcoin Lightning Network protocol designs, compare channel factory approaches, and analyze Layer 2 scaling tradeoffs. Covers trust models, on-chain footprint, consensus requirements, HTLC/PTLC compatibility, liveness, and watchtower support.

gha-security-review

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

Find exploitable vulnerabilities in GitHub Actions workflows. Every finding MUST include a concrete exploitation scenario — if you can't build the attack, don't report it.

gh-review-requests

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

Fetch unread GitHub notifications for open PRs where review is requested from a specified team or opened by a team member. Use when asked to "find PRs I need to review", "show my review requests", "what needs my review", "fetch GitHub review requests", or "check team review queue".

fix-review

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

Verify fix commits address audit findings without new bugs

error-debugging-multi-agent-review

38
from lingxling/awesome-skills-cn

Use when working with error debugging multi agent review