acceptance-criteria-verification
Use after implementing features - verifies each acceptance criterion with structured testing and posts verification reports to the GitHub issue
Best use case
acceptance-criteria-verification is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Use after implementing features - verifies each acceptance criterion with structured testing and posts verification reports to the GitHub issue
Teams using acceptance-criteria-verification should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/acceptance-criteria-verification/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How acceptance-criteria-verification Compares
| Feature / Agent | acceptance-criteria-verification | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Use after implementing features - verifies each acceptance criterion with structured testing and posts verification reports to the GitHub issue
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Acceptance Criteria Verification
## Overview
Systematically verify each acceptance criterion and post structured reports.
**Core principle:** Every criterion verified. Every verification documented.
**Announce at start:** "I'm using acceptance-criteria-verification to verify the implementation."
## The Verification Process
### Step 1: Extract Criteria
Read the issue and extract all acceptance criteria:
```bash
# Get issue body
gh issue view [ISSUE_NUMBER] --json body -q '.body'
```
Parse out criteria (look for `- [ ]` or `- [x]` patterns in acceptance criteria section).
### Step 2: Plan Verification
For each criterion, determine:
| Criterion | Test Type | How to Verify |
|-----------|-----------|---------------|
| [Criterion 1] | Unit test | Run specific test |
| [Criterion 2] | Integration | API call + response check |
| [Criterion 3] | E2E | Browser automation |
| [Criterion 4] | Manual | Visual inspection |
### Step 3: Execute Verification
For each criterion, run the appropriate verification:
#### Unit/Integration Tests
```bash
# Run specific tests
pnpm test --grep "[test pattern]"
# Or run test file
pnpm test path/to/specific.test.ts
```
#### E2E Tests
```bash
# If using Playwright
npx playwright test [test file]
# If using browser automation MCP
# Use mcp__playwright or mcp__puppeteer
```
#### Manual Verification
For criteria requiring visual or interactive verification:
1. Start the application
2. Navigate to relevant area
3. Perform the action
4. Capture screenshot if relevant
5. Document result
### Step 4: Record Results
For each criterion, record:
```
Criterion: [Text from issue]
Status: PASS | FAIL | PARTIAL | SKIP
Evidence: [Test output, screenshot, observation]
Notes: [Any relevant details]
```
### Step 5: Post Verification Report
Post a structured comment to the issue:
```bash
gh issue comment [ISSUE_NUMBER] --body "## Verification Report
**Run**: $(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)
**By**: agent
**Commit**: $(git rev-parse --short HEAD)
**Branch**: $(git branch --show-current)
### Results
| # | Criterion | Status | Notes |
|---|-----------|--------|-------|
| 1 | [Criterion text] | PASS | [Notes] |
| 2 | [Criterion text] | FAIL | [What failed] |
| 3 | [Criterion text] | PARTIAL | [What works, what doesn't] |
### Summary
| Status | Count |
|--------|-------|
| PASS | X |
| FAIL | X |
| PARTIAL | X |
| SKIP | X |
| **Total** | **X** |
### Test Output
<details>
<summary>Test Results</summary>
\`\`\`
[test output here]
\`\`\`
</details>
### Next Steps
- [ ] [Action items for failures/partials]
"
```
### Step 6: Update Issue Checkboxes
For each passing criterion, check it off in the issue body:
```bash
# Get current body
BODY=$(gh issue view [ISSUE_NUMBER] --json body -q '.body')
# Update checkboxes for passing criteria
# (Implementation depends on body format)
# Update issue
gh issue edit [ISSUE_NUMBER] --body "$NEW_BODY"
```
### Step 7: Update Project Fields
```bash
# Update project fields using project-status-sync skill
# Verification status
# - All PASS → Passing
# - Any FAIL → Failing
# - Mix of PASS/PARTIAL → Partial
# Criteria Met count
# - Count of PASS criteria
# Last Verified
# - Current date
# Verified By
# - "agent"
```
## Status Definitions
| Status | Meaning | Action |
|--------|---------|--------|
| **PASS** | Criterion fully met, verified working | Check off in issue |
| **FAIL** | Criterion not met, requires fix | Document what failed, return to development |
| **PARTIAL** | Works with issues, needs improvement | Document issues, may need fix |
| **SKIP** | Could not verify (blocked, N/A, etc.) | Document reason |
## E2E Verification Best Practices
When using browser automation:
1. **Start fresh** - New browser session for each verification
2. **Capture evidence** - Screenshots at key points
3. **Check visible state** - Not just DOM, but visible rendering
4. **Test error cases** - Not just happy path
5. **Clean up** - Close sessions after verification
```javascript
// Example verification flow (pseudo-code)
await page.goto(appUrl);
await page.click('[data-testid="new-chat"]');
await page.waitForSelector('[data-testid="chat-input"]');
await page.screenshot({ path: 'new-chat-verification.png' });
// Verify expected state
const title = await page.title();
expect(title).toContain('New Chat');
```
## Handling Failures
When criteria fail:
1. **Document specifically** what failed
2. **Include reproduction steps** if not obvious
3. **Capture error messages** or screenshots
4. **Return to development** to fix
5. **Re-run verification** after fix
Do NOT:
- Mark as PASS when it failed
- Skip verification because "it should work"
- Ignore intermittent failures
## Verification Checklist
Before completing verification:
- [ ] All acceptance criteria evaluated
- [ ] Each criterion has clear PASS/FAIL/PARTIAL/SKIP status
- [ ] Evidence captured for each (test output, screenshots)
- [ ] Verification report posted to issue
- [ ] Issue checkboxes updated for passing criteria
- [ ] Project fields updated
- [ ] If any failures, next steps documented
## After Verification
Based on results:
| Overall Result | Next Action |
|----------------|-------------|
| All PASS | Proceed to code review |
| Any FAIL | Return to development, fix, re-verify |
| Partial only | Discuss with user - acceptable or needs fix? |
## Integration
This skill is called by:
- `issue-driven-development` - Step 8
This skill calls:
- `project-status-sync` - Update verification fields
- `issue-lifecycle` - Post commentsRelated Skills
acceptance-testing
Plan and (when feasible) implement or execute user acceptance tests (UAT) / end-to-end acceptance scenarios. Converts requirements or user stories into acceptance criteria, test cases, test data, and a sign-off checklist; suggests automation (Playwright/Cypress for web, golden/snapshot tests for CLIs/APIs). Use when validating user-visible behavior for a release, or mapping requirements to acceptance coverage.
acceptance-tester
Execute systematic acceptance testing to verify implementations against acceptance criteria. Use this skill when tasks mention "驗收測試", "acceptance testing", "驗收", "validate implementation", or when Gherkin scenarios need to be executed.
acceptance-test-writing
Guide for writing high-quality acceptance criteria and acceptance tests using industry-standard BDD (Behavior-Driven Development) and ATDD (Acceptance Test-Driven Development) practices. Use this skill when creating acceptance criteria for user stories, writing Gherkin scenarios, or implementing acceptance test specifications following Given-When-Then format.
acceptance-criteria
检查Acceptance Criteria格式和完整性,验证是否符合Given-When-Then结构、覆盖正常流程/边界条件/异常场景。适合在为User Story编写AC后、准备测试用例前使用,当需要验收AC质量时。帮助不熟悉BDD的PM/BA确保AC明确、可测试、覆盖完整,避免遗漏关键场景。
acceptance-criteria-creator
Create acceptance criteria creator operations. Auto-activating skill for Enterprise Workflows. Triggers on: acceptance criteria creator, acceptance criteria creator Part of the Enterprise Workflows skill category. Use when working with acceptance criteria creator functionality. Trigger with phrases like "acceptance criteria creator", "acceptance creator", "acceptance".
acceptance-criteria-authoring
Write clear, testable acceptance criteria in Given-When-Then format following INVEST principles and BDD best practices.
verification-before-completion
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing changes - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
agent-ops-article-verification
Systematically deconstruct written content into verifiable claims, validate each using search/documentation, and facilitate informed discussion through structured interviewing.
grail-miner
This skill assists in setting up, managing, and optimizing Grail miners on Bittensor Subnet 81, handling tasks like environment configuration, R2 storage, model checkpoint management, and performance tuning.
thor-skills
An entry point and router for AI agents to manage various THOR-related cybersecurity tasks, including running scans, analyzing logs, troubleshooting, and maintenance.
chrome-debug
This skill empowers AI agents to debug web applications and inspect browser behavior using the Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP), offering both collaborative (headful) and automated (headless) modes.
lets-go-rss
A lightweight, full-platform RSS subscription manager that aggregates content from YouTube, Vimeo, Behance, Twitter/X, and Chinese platforms like Bilibili, Weibo, and Douyin, featuring deduplication and AI smart classification.