verification-before-completion
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing changes - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
Best use case
verification-before-completion is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing changes - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
Teams using verification-before-completion should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/VERIFY-BEFORE-COMPLETE/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How verification-before-completion Compares
| Feature / Agent | verification-before-completion | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing changes - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Verification Before Completion
## Overview
Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.
**Core principle:** Evidence before claims, always.
**DONT run npx playwright in the background, run in terminal for visibility**
**Violating the letter of this rule is violating the spirit of this rule.**
## The Iron Law
```
NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE
```
If you haven't run the verification command in this message, you cannot claim it passes.
## The Gate Function
```
BEFORE claiming any status or expressing satisfaction:
1. IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
2. RUN: Execute the FULL command (fresh, complete)
3. READ: Full output, check exit code, count failures
4. VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
- If NO: State actual status with evidence
- If YES: State claim WITH evidence
5. ONLY THEN: Make the claim
Skip any step = lying, not verifying
```
## Common Failures
| Claim | Requires | Not Sufficient |
| --------------------- | ------------------------------- | ------------------------------ |
| Tests pass | Test command output: 0 failures | Previous run, "should pass" |
| Linter clean | Linter output: 0 errors | Partial check, extrapolation |
| Build succeeds | Build command: exit 0 | Linter passing, logs look good |
| Bug fixed | Test original symptom: passes | Code changed, assumed fixed |
| Regression test works | Red-green cycle verified | Test passes once |
| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" |
| Requirements met | Line-by-line checklist | Tests passing |
## Red Flags - STOP
- Using "should", "probably", "seems to"
- Expressing satisfaction before verification ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", etc.)
- About to commit/push/PR without verification
- Trusting agent success reports
- Relying on partial verification
- Thinking "just this once"
- Tired and wanting work over
- **ANY wording implying success without having run verification**
## Rationalization Prevention
| Excuse | Reality |
| --------------------------------------- | ---------------------- |
| "Should work now" | RUN the verification |
| "I'm confident" | Confidence ≠ evidence |
| "Just this once" | No exceptions |
| "Linter passed" | Linter ≠ compiler |
| "Agent said success" | Verify independently |
| "I'm tired" | Exhaustion ≠ excuse |
| "Partial check is enough" | Partial proves nothing |
| "Different words so rule doesn't apply" | Spirit over letter |
## Key Patterns
**Tests:**
```
✅ [Run test command] [See: 34/34 pass] "All tests pass"
❌ "Should pass now" / "Looks correct"
```
**Regression tests (TDD Red-Green):**
```
✅ Write → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST FAIL) → Restore → Run (pass)
❌ "I've written a regression test" (without red-green verification)
```
**Build:**
```
✅ [Run build] [See: exit 0] "Build passes"
❌ "Linter passed" (linter doesn't check compilation)
```
**Requirements:**
```
✅ Re-read plan → Create checklist → Verify each → Report gaps or completion
❌ "Tests pass, phase complete"
```
**Agent delegation:**
```
✅ Agent reports success → Check VCS diff → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent report
```
## Why This Matters
From 24 failure memories:
- your human partner said "I don't believe you" - trust broken
- Undefined functions shipped - would crash
- Missing requirements shipped - incomplete features
- Time wasted on false completion → redirect → rework
- Violates: "Honesty is a core value. If you lie, you'll be replaced."
## When To Apply
**ALWAYS before:**
- ANY variation of success/completion claims
- ANY expression of satisfaction
- ANY positive statement about work state
- Committing, task completion
- Moving to next task
- Delegating to agents
**Rule applies to:**
- Exact phrases
- Paraphrases and synonyms
- Implications of success
- ANY communication suggesting completion/correctness
## The Bottom Line
**No shortcuts for verification.**
Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.
This is non-negotiable.Related Skills
acceptance-criteria-verification
Use after implementing features - verifies each acceptance criterion with structured testing and posts verification reports to the GitHub issue
agent-ops-article-verification
Systematically deconstruct written content into verifiable claims, validate each using search/documentation, and facilitate informed discussion through structured interviewing.
tech-blog
Generates comprehensive technical blog posts, offering detailed explanations of system internals, architecture, and implementation, either through source code analysis or document-driven research.
ux
This AI agent skill provides comprehensive guidance for creating professional and insightful User Experience (UX) designs, covering user research, information architecture, interaction design, visual guidance, and usability evaluation. It aims to produce actionable, user-centered solutions that avoid generic AI aesthetics.
vly-money
Generate crypto payment links for supported tokens and networks, manage access to X402 payment-protected content, and provide direct access to the vly.money wallet interface.
modal-deployment
Run Python code in the cloud with serverless containers, GPUs, and autoscaling using Modal. This skill enables agents to generate code for deploying ML models, running batch jobs, serving APIs, and scaling compute-intensive workloads.
ontopo
An AI agent skill to search for Israeli restaurants, check table availability, view menus, and retrieve booking links via the Ontopo platform, acting as an unofficial interface to its data.
whisper-transcribe
Transcribes audio and video files to text using OpenAI's Whisper CLI, enhanced with contextual grounding from local markdown files for improved accuracy.
lets-go-rss
A lightweight, full-platform RSS subscription manager that aggregates content from YouTube, Vimeo, Behance, Twitter/X, and Chinese platforms like Bilibili, Weibo, and Douyin, featuring deduplication and AI smart classification.
grail-miner
This skill assists in setting up, managing, and optimizing Grail miners on Bittensor Subnet 81, handling tasks like environment configuration, R2 storage, model checkpoint management, and performance tuning.
chrome-debug
This skill empowers AI agents to debug web applications and inspect browser behavior using the Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP), offering both collaborative (headful) and automated (headless) modes.
astro
This skill provides essential Astro framework patterns, focusing on server-side rendering (SSR), static site generation (SSG), middleware, and TypeScript best practices. It helps AI agents implement secure authentication, manage API routes, and debug rendering behaviors within Astro projects.