elixir-docs-review
Reviews Elixir documentation for completeness, quality, and ExDoc best practices. Use when auditing @moduledoc, @doc, @spec coverage, doctest correctness, and cross-reference usage in .ex files.
Best use case
elixir-docs-review is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Reviews Elixir documentation for completeness, quality, and ExDoc best practices. Use when auditing @moduledoc, @doc, @spec coverage, doctest correctness, and cross-reference usage in .ex files.
Teams using elixir-docs-review should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/elixir-docs-review/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How elixir-docs-review Compares
| Feature / Agent | elixir-docs-review | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Reviews Elixir documentation for completeness, quality, and ExDoc best practices. Use when auditing @moduledoc, @doc, @spec coverage, doctest correctness, and cross-reference usage in .ex files.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
Cursor vs Codex for AI Workflows
Compare Cursor and Codex for AI coding workflows, repository assistance, debugging, refactoring, and reusable developer skills.
SKILL.md Source
# Elixir Documentation Review ## Quick Reference | Issue Type | Reference | |------------|-----------| | @moduledoc, @doc quality, anti-patterns | [references/doc-quality.md](references/doc-quality.md) | | @spec, @type, @typedoc coverage | [references/spec-coverage.md](references/spec-coverage.md) | ## Review Checklist ### Module Documentation - [ ] All public modules have @moduledoc - [ ] First-line summary is concise (one line, used by tools as summary) - [ ] @moduledoc includes ## Examples where appropriate - [ ] @moduledoc false only on internal/implementation modules ### Function Documentation - [ ] All public functions have @doc - [ ] All public functions have @spec - [ ] @doc describes return values clearly - [ ] Multi-clause functions documented before first clause - [ ] Function head declared when arg names need clarification ### Doctests - [ ] Doctests present for pure, deterministic functions - [ ] No doctests for side-effectful operations (DB, HTTP, etc.) - [ ] Doctests actually run (module included in test file) ### Cross-References - [ ] Module references use backtick auto-linking (`MyModule`) - [ ] Function refs use proper arity format (`function/2`) - [ ] Type refs use t: prefix (`t:typename/0`) - [ ] No plain-text references where auto-links are possible ### Metadata - [ ] @since annotations on new public API additions - [ ] @deprecated with migration guidance where appropriate ## Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag) - **@doc false on callback implementations** - Documented at behaviour level - **@doc false on protocol implementations** - Protocol docs cover the intent - **Missing @spec on private functions** - @spec optional for internals - **Short @moduledoc without ## Examples on simple utility modules** - Not every module needs examples - **Using @impl true without separate @doc** - Inherits documentation from behaviour ## Context-Sensitive Rules | Issue | Flag ONLY IF | |-------|--------------| | Missing @moduledoc | Module is public AND not a protocol impl | | Missing @spec | Function is public AND exported | | Missing doctests | Function is pure AND deterministic | | Generic @doc | Doc restates function name without adding value | ## When to Load References - Reviewing @moduledoc or @doc quality, seeing anti-patterns -> doc-quality.md - Reviewing @spec, @type, or @typedoc coverage -> spec-coverage.md ## Before Submitting Findings Load and follow [review-verification-protocol](../review-verification-protocol/SKILL.md) before reporting any issue.
Related Skills
Post-Mortem & Incident Review Framework
Run structured post-mortems that actually prevent repeat failures. Blameless analysis, root cause identification, and action tracking.
Pitch Deck Reviewer
Reviews pitch decks and provides investor-ready feedback with scoring
Performance Review Engine
> Your AI-powered performance management system. Write reviews that develop people, not just evaluate them. From self-assessments to 360° feedback to calibration — complete frameworks for every review cycle.
Deal Desk — Structured Deal Review & Approval
Run every non-standard deal through a repeatable review process. Catch margin leaks, enforce discount guardrails, and close faster with pre-approved terms.
Contract Review Assistant
Analyze business contracts for risks, unfavorable terms, and missing clauses. Get a plain-English summary of what you're signing.
afrexai-code-reviewer
Enterprise-grade code review agent. Reviews PRs, diffs, or code files for security vulnerabilities, performance issues, error handling gaps, architecture smells, and test coverage. Works with any language, any repo, no dependencies required.
performance-review-cn
绩效面谈报告、OKR对齐度检测、校准辅助
clawdtm-review
Review and rate OpenClaw skills on ClawdTM. See what humans and AI agents recommend.
docs-pipeline-automation
Build repeatable data-to-Docs pipelines from Sheets and Drive sources. Use for automated status reports, template-based document assembly, and scheduled publishing workflows.
cyber-owasp-review
Map application security findings to OWASP Top 10 categories and generate remediation checklists. Use for normalized AppSec review outputs and category-level prioritization.
Contract Reviewer - AI Legal Document Risk Scanner
Upload any contract or legal document and get a structured risk analysis with flagged clauses, plain-language explanations, and negotiation suggestions.
serde-code-review
Reviews serde serialization code for derive patterns, enum representations, custom implementations, and common serialization bugs. Use when reviewing Rust code that uses serde, serde_json, toml, or any serde-based serialization format. Covers attribute macros, field renaming, and format-specific pitfalls.