exunit-code-review
Reviews ExUnit test code for proper patterns, boundary mocking with Mox, and test adapter usage. Use when reviewing _test.exs files or test helper configurations.
Best use case
exunit-code-review is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Reviews ExUnit test code for proper patterns, boundary mocking with Mox, and test adapter usage. Use when reviewing _test.exs files or test helper configurations.
Teams using exunit-code-review should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/exunit-code-review/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How exunit-code-review Compares
| Feature / Agent | exunit-code-review | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Reviews ExUnit test code for proper patterns, boundary mocking with Mox, and test adapter usage. Use when reviewing _test.exs files or test helper configurations.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
Cursor vs Codex for AI Workflows
Compare Cursor and Codex for AI coding workflows, repository assistance, debugging, refactoring, and reusable developer skills.
SKILL.md Source
# ExUnit Code Review ## Quick Reference | Issue Type | Reference | |------------|-----------| | Async tests, setup, describe, tags | [references/exunit-patterns.md](references/exunit-patterns.md) | | Behavior-based mocking, expectations | [references/mox-boundaries.md](references/mox-boundaries.md) | | Bypass, Swoosh, Oban testing | [references/test-adapters.md](references/test-adapters.md) | | What to mock vs real, Ecto sandbox | [references/integration-tests.md](references/integration-tests.md) | ## Mock Boundary Philosophy **Mock at external boundaries:** - HTTP clients, external APIs, third-party services - Slow resources: file system, email, job queues - Non-deterministic: DateTime.utc_now(), :rand **DO NOT mock internal code:** - Contexts, schemas, GenServers - Internal modules, PubSub - Anything you wrote ## Review Checklist ### Test Structure - [ ] Tests are `async: true` unless sharing database state - [ ] Describe-blocks group related tests - [ ] Setup extracts common test data - [ ] Tests have clear arrange/act/assert structure ### Mocking - [ ] Mox used for external boundaries (HTTP, APIs) - [ ] Behaviors defined for mockable interfaces - [ ] No mocking of internal modules - [ ] verify_on_exit! in setup for strict mocking ### Test Adapters - [ ] Bypass for HTTP endpoint mocking - [ ] Swoosh.TestAdapter for email testing - [ ] Oban.Testing for background job assertions ### Database - [ ] Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox for isolation - [ ] Async tests don't share database state - [ ] Fixtures/factories used consistently ## Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag) - **Mock in unit test, real in integration** - Different test levels have different needs - **Not mocking database in integration tests** - Database is internal - **Simple inline test data** - Not everything needs factories - **Testing private functions via public API** - Correct approach ## Context-Sensitive Rules | Issue | Flag ONLY IF | |-------|--------------| | Not async | Test actually needs shared state | | Missing mock | External call exists AND no mock/bypass | | Mock internal | Module being mocked is internal code | ## Before Submitting Findings Use the issue format: `[FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE` for each finding. Load and follow [review-verification-protocol](../review-verification-protocol/SKILL.md) before reporting any issue.
Related Skills
Post-Mortem & Incident Review Framework
Run structured post-mortems that actually prevent repeat failures. Blameless analysis, root cause identification, and action tracking.
Pitch Deck Reviewer
Reviews pitch decks and provides investor-ready feedback with scoring
Performance Review Engine
> Your AI-powered performance management system. Write reviews that develop people, not just evaluate them. From self-assessments to 360° feedback to calibration — complete frameworks for every review cycle.
Deal Desk — Structured Deal Review & Approval
Run every non-standard deal through a repeatable review process. Catch margin leaks, enforce discount guardrails, and close faster with pre-approved terms.
Contract Review Assistant
Analyze business contracts for risks, unfavorable terms, and missing clauses. Get a plain-English summary of what you're signing.
afrexai-code-reviewer
Enterprise-grade code review agent. Reviews PRs, diffs, or code files for security vulnerabilities, performance issues, error handling gaps, architecture smells, and test coverage. Works with any language, any repo, no dependencies required.
performance-review-cn
绩效面谈报告、OKR对齐度检测、校准辅助
clawdtm-review
Review and rate OpenClaw skills on ClawdTM. See what humans and AI agents recommend.
cyber-owasp-review
Map application security findings to OWASP Top 10 categories and generate remediation checklists. Use for normalized AppSec review outputs and category-level prioritization.
Contract Reviewer - AI Legal Document Risk Scanner
Upload any contract or legal document and get a structured risk analysis with flagged clauses, plain-language explanations, and negotiation suggestions.
serde-code-review
Reviews serde serialization code for derive patterns, enum representations, custom implementations, and common serialization bugs. Use when reviewing Rust code that uses serde, serde_json, toml, or any serde-based serialization format. Covers attribute macros, field renaming, and format-specific pitfalls.
rust-testing-code-review
Reviews Rust test code for unit test patterns, integration test structure, async testing, mocking approaches, and property-based testing. Use when reviewing _test.rs files,