superpowers-requesting-code-review
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging - dispatches code review subagent to catch issues before they cascade, adapted for OpenClaw sessions_spawn model
Best use case
superpowers-requesting-code-review is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging - dispatches code review subagent to catch issues before they cascade, adapted for OpenClaw sessions_spawn model
Teams using superpowers-requesting-code-review should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/openclaw-requesting-code-review/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How superpowers-requesting-code-review Compares
| Feature / Agent | superpowers-requesting-code-review | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging - dispatches code review subagent to catch issues before they cascade, adapted for OpenClaw sessions_spawn model
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
Cursor vs Codex for AI Workflows
Compare Cursor and Codex for AI coding workflows, repository assistance, debugging, refactoring, and reusable developer skills.
SKILL.md Source
# Superpowers Requesting Code Review（OpenClaw 适配版）
## 概述
在问题级联前派发代码审查 subagent 捕获问题。审查者获得精确构造的上下文做评估——永远不是你 session 的历史。这保持审查者专注在工作产出上，而非你的思维过程。
**核心原则：** 尽早审查，经常审查。
## OpenClaw 适配
Superpowers 原版使用 `Task` 工具派发 code-reviewer subagent。OpenClaw 用 `sessions_spawn`：
- 派发前准备审查上下文（git diff、变更摘要、规格引用）
- 用 `sessions_spawn(mode="run")` 派发一次性审查 session
- 审查结果通过 session 历史或文件系统返回
## 何时请求审查
**强制：**
- subagent-dev 中每个任务完成后
- 完成重大功能后
- Merge 到 main 前
**可选但有价值：**
- 卡住时（新鲜视角）
- 重构前（基线检查）
- 修复复杂 bug 后
## 如何请求
### 1. 收集上下文
```bash
# 获取 git diff
git diff BASE_SHA HEAD > /tmp/review-diff.patch
git log --oneline BASE_SHA..HEAD
# 获取变更统计
git diff --stat BASE_SHA HEAD
```
### 2. 准备审查 prompt
审查 prompt 应包含：
- **实现了什么** — 刚刚构建的内容
- **计划/需求** — 应该做什么
- **基准 SHA** — 起始 commit
- **头部 SHA** — 结束 commit
- **变更描述** — 简要总结
### 3. 派发审查 subagent
```javascript
sessions_spawn({
task: `代码审查请求
实现了什么：
[具体描述刚完成的工作]
规格/需求：
[任务来自哪个计划，相关规格要求]
变更：
[git diff 关键内容或指向 diff 文件的路径]
请审查：
1. 规格合规——实现是否满足需求？
2. 代码质量——DRY、命名、测试设计
3. 潜在问题——bug、边界情况、安全
返回：strengths、issues（按 severity 分类）、assessment`,
runtime: "subagent",
mode: "run",
cwd: "/path/to/project"
})
```
### 4. 处理反馈
- 立即修复 Critical 问题
- 继续前修复 Important 问题
- 记录 Minor 问题供以后
- 如果审查者错了——用技术理由反驳
## 审查关注点
### 规格合规
- 每个计划需求有对应实现吗？
- 没有做多余的东西？
- 边界情况覆盖了吗？
### 代码质量
- DRY（不要重复自己）？
- 命名清晰有意义？
- 测试覆盖好？
- 没有明显的性能问题？
### 问题严重度
| 级别 | 含义 | 行动 |
|------|------|------|
| **Critical** | 破坏功能或安全 | 立即修复 |
| **Important** | 重要但非破坏 | 继续前修复 |
| **Minor** | 风格/改进建议 | 记录可选做 |
## Red Flags
**永远不要：**
- 因为"简单"就跳过审查
- 忽略 Critical 问题
- 有未修复 Important 问题时继续
- 用合理技术反驳有效反馈
**如果审查者错了：**
- 用技术理由反驳
- 展示证明它工作的代码/测试
- 请求澄清
## 与工作流集成
**Subagent 驱动开发：**
- 每个任务**后**审查
- 在问题级联前捕获
- 继续前修复
**顺序执行：**
- 每个批次（3 个任务）后审查
- 获得反馈，应用，继续
**临时开发：**
- Merge 前审查
- 卡住时审查Related Skills
Post-Mortem & Incident Review Framework
Run structured post-mortems that actually prevent repeat failures. Blameless analysis, root cause identification, and action tracking.
Pitch Deck Reviewer
Reviews pitch decks and provides investor-ready feedback with scoring
Performance Review Engine
> Your AI-powered performance management system. Write reviews that develop people, not just evaluate them. From self-assessments to 360° feedback to calibration — complete frameworks for every review cycle.
Deal Desk — Structured Deal Review & Approval
Run every non-standard deal through a repeatable review process. Catch margin leaks, enforce discount guardrails, and close faster with pre-approved terms.
Contract Review Assistant
Analyze business contracts for risks, unfavorable terms, and missing clauses. Get a plain-English summary of what you're signing.
afrexai-code-reviewer
Enterprise-grade code review agent. Reviews PRs, diffs, or code files for security vulnerabilities, performance issues, error handling gaps, architecture smells, and test coverage. Works with any language, any repo, no dependencies required.
performance-review-cn
绩效面谈报告、OKR对齐度检测、校准辅助
clawdtm-review
Review and rate OpenClaw skills on ClawdTM. See what humans and AI agents recommend.
cyber-owasp-review
Map application security findings to OWASP Top 10 categories and generate remediation checklists. Use for normalized AppSec review outputs and category-level prioritization.
Contract Reviewer - AI Legal Document Risk Scanner
Upload any contract or legal document and get a structured risk analysis with flagged clauses, plain-language explanations, and negotiation suggestions.
serde-code-review
Reviews serde serialization code for derive patterns, enum representations, custom implementations, and common serialization bugs. Use when reviewing Rust code that uses serde, serde_json, toml, or any serde-based serialization format. Covers attribute macros, field renaming, and format-specific pitfalls.
rust-testing-code-review
Reviews Rust test code for unit test patterns, integration test structure, async testing, mocking approaches, and property-based testing. Use when reviewing _test.rs files,