swift-code-review
Reviews Swift code for concurrency safety, error handling, memory management, and common mistakes. Use when reviewing .swift files for async/await patterns, actor isolation, Sendable conformance, or general Swift best practices.
Best use case
swift-code-review is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Reviews Swift code for concurrency safety, error handling, memory management, and common mistakes. Use when reviewing .swift files for async/await patterns, actor isolation, Sendable conformance, or general Swift best practices.
Teams using swift-code-review should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/swift-code-review/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How swift-code-review Compares
| Feature / Agent | swift-code-review | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Reviews Swift code for concurrency safety, error handling, memory management, and common mistakes. Use when reviewing .swift files for async/await patterns, actor isolation, Sendable conformance, or general Swift best practices.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
Cursor vs Codex for AI Workflows
Compare Cursor and Codex for AI coding workflows, repository assistance, debugging, refactoring, and reusable developer skills.
SKILL.md Source
# Swift Code Review ## Quick Reference | Issue Type | Reference | |------------|-----------| | async/await, actors, Sendable, Task | [references/concurrency.md](references/concurrency.md) | | @Observable, @ObservationIgnored, @Bindable | [references/observable.md](references/observable.md) | | throws, Result, try?, typed throws | [references/error-handling.md](references/error-handling.md) | | Force unwraps, retain cycles, naming | [references/common-mistakes.md](references/common-mistakes.md) | ## Review Checklist - [ ] No force unwraps (`!`) on runtime data (network, user input, files) - [ ] Closures stored as properties use `[weak self]` - [ ] Delegate properties are `weak` - [ ] Independent async operations use `async let` or `TaskGroup` - [ ] Long-running Tasks check `Task.isCancelled` - [ ] Actors have mutable state to protect (no stateless actors) - [ ] Sendable types are truly thread-safe (beware `@unchecked`) - [ ] Errors handled explicitly (no empty catch blocks) - [ ] Custom errors conform to `LocalizedError` with descriptive messages - [ ] Nested @Observable objects are also marked @Observable - [ ] @Bindable used for two-way bindings to Observable objects ## When to Load References - Reviewing async/await, actors, or TaskGroups → concurrency.md - Reviewing @Observable or SwiftUI state → observable.md - Reviewing error handling or throws → error-handling.md - General Swift review → common-mistakes.md ## Review Questions 1. Are async operations that could run concurrently using `async let`? 2. Could actor state change across suspension points (reentrancy bug)? 3. Is `@unchecked Sendable` backed by actual synchronization? 4. Are errors logged and presented with helpful context? 5. Could any closure or delegate create a retain cycle?
Related Skills
Post-Mortem & Incident Review Framework
Run structured post-mortems that actually prevent repeat failures. Blameless analysis, root cause identification, and action tracking.
Pitch Deck Reviewer
Reviews pitch decks and provides investor-ready feedback with scoring
Performance Review Engine
> Your AI-powered performance management system. Write reviews that develop people, not just evaluate them. From self-assessments to 360° feedback to calibration — complete frameworks for every review cycle.
Deal Desk — Structured Deal Review & Approval
Run every non-standard deal through a repeatable review process. Catch margin leaks, enforce discount guardrails, and close faster with pre-approved terms.
Contract Review Assistant
Analyze business contracts for risks, unfavorable terms, and missing clauses. Get a plain-English summary of what you're signing.
afrexai-code-reviewer
Enterprise-grade code review agent. Reviews PRs, diffs, or code files for security vulnerabilities, performance issues, error handling gaps, architecture smells, and test coverage. Works with any language, any repo, no dependencies required.
performance-review-cn
绩效面谈报告、OKR对齐度检测、校准辅助
clawdtm-review
Review and rate OpenClaw skills on ClawdTM. See what humans and AI agents recommend.
cyber-owasp-review
Map application security findings to OWASP Top 10 categories and generate remediation checklists. Use for normalized AppSec review outputs and category-level prioritization.
Contract Reviewer - AI Legal Document Risk Scanner
Upload any contract or legal document and get a structured risk analysis with flagged clauses, plain-language explanations, and negotiation suggestions.
serde-code-review
Reviews serde serialization code for derive patterns, enum representations, custom implementations, and common serialization bugs. Use when reviewing Rust code that uses serde, serde_json, toml, or any serde-based serialization format. Covers attribute macros, field renaming, and format-specific pitfalls.
rust-testing-code-review
Reviews Rust test code for unit test patterns, integration test structure, async testing, mocking approaches, and property-based testing. Use when reviewing _test.rs files,