swiftdata-code-review
Reviews SwiftData code for model design, queries, concurrency, and migrations. Use when reviewing .swift files with import SwiftData, @Model, @Query, @ModelActor, or VersionedSchema.
Best use case
swiftdata-code-review is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Reviews SwiftData code for model design, queries, concurrency, and migrations. Use when reviewing .swift files with import SwiftData, @Model, @Query, @ModelActor, or VersionedSchema.
Teams using swiftdata-code-review should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/swiftdata-code-review/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How swiftdata-code-review Compares
| Feature / Agent | swiftdata-code-review | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Reviews SwiftData code for model design, queries, concurrency, and migrations. Use when reviewing .swift files with import SwiftData, @Model, @Query, @ModelActor, or VersionedSchema.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
Cursor vs Codex for AI Workflows
Compare Cursor and Codex for AI coding workflows, repository assistance, debugging, refactoring, and reusable developer skills.
SKILL.md Source
# SwiftData Code Review ## Quick Reference | Issue Type | Reference | |------------|-----------| | @Model, @Attribute, @Relationship, delete rules | [references/model-design.md](references/model-design.md) | | @Query, #Predicate, FetchDescriptor, #Index | [references/queries.md](references/queries.md) | | @ModelActor, ModelContext, background operations | [references/concurrency.md](references/concurrency.md) | | VersionedSchema, MigrationStage, lightweight/custom | [references/migrations.md](references/migrations.md) | ## Review Checklist - [ ] Models marked `final` (subclassing crashes) - [ ] @Relationship decorator on ONE side only (not both) - [ ] Delete rules explicitly set (not relying on default .nullify) - [ ] Relationships initialized to empty arrays, not default objects - [ ] Batch operations used for bulk inserts (`append(contentsOf:)`) - [ ] @Query not loading thousands of items on main thread - [ ] External values in predicates captured in local variables - [ ] Scalar comparisons in predicates (not object references) - [ ] @ModelActor used for background operations - [ ] PersistentIdentifier/DTOs used to pass data between actors - [ ] VersionedSchema defined for each shipped version - [ ] MigrationPlan passed to ModelContainer ## When to Load References - Reviewing @Model or relationships -> model-design.md - Reviewing @Query or #Predicate -> queries.md - Reviewing @ModelActor or background work -> concurrency.md - Reviewing schema changes or migrations -> migrations.md ## Review Questions 1. Could this relationship assignment cause NULL foreign keys? 2. Is @Relationship on both sides creating circular references? 3. Could this @Query block the main thread with large datasets? 4. Are model objects being passed between actors unsafely? 5. Would schema changes require a migration plan?
Related Skills
Post-Mortem & Incident Review Framework
Run structured post-mortems that actually prevent repeat failures. Blameless analysis, root cause identification, and action tracking.
Pitch Deck Reviewer
Reviews pitch decks and provides investor-ready feedback with scoring
Performance Review Engine
> Your AI-powered performance management system. Write reviews that develop people, not just evaluate them. From self-assessments to 360° feedback to calibration — complete frameworks for every review cycle.
Deal Desk — Structured Deal Review & Approval
Run every non-standard deal through a repeatable review process. Catch margin leaks, enforce discount guardrails, and close faster with pre-approved terms.
Contract Review Assistant
Analyze business contracts for risks, unfavorable terms, and missing clauses. Get a plain-English summary of what you're signing.
afrexai-code-reviewer
Enterprise-grade code review agent. Reviews PRs, diffs, or code files for security vulnerabilities, performance issues, error handling gaps, architecture smells, and test coverage. Works with any language, any repo, no dependencies required.
performance-review-cn
绩效面谈报告、OKR对齐度检测、校准辅助
clawdtm-review
Review and rate OpenClaw skills on ClawdTM. See what humans and AI agents recommend.
cyber-owasp-review
Map application security findings to OWASP Top 10 categories and generate remediation checklists. Use for normalized AppSec review outputs and category-level prioritization.
Contract Reviewer - AI Legal Document Risk Scanner
Upload any contract or legal document and get a structured risk analysis with flagged clauses, plain-language explanations, and negotiation suggestions.
serde-code-review
Reviews serde serialization code for derive patterns, enum representations, custom implementations, and common serialization bugs. Use when reviewing Rust code that uses serde, serde_json, toml, or any serde-based serialization format. Covers attribute macros, field renaming, and format-specific pitfalls.
rust-testing-code-review
Reviews Rust test code for unit test patterns, integration test structure, async testing, mocking approaches, and property-based testing. Use when reviewing _test.rs files,