tokio-async-code-review

Reviews tokio async runtime usage for task management, sync primitives, channel patterns, and runtime configuration. Use when reviewing Rust code that uses tokio, async/await patterns, spawn, channels, or async synchronization. Also covers tokio-util, tower, and hyper integration patterns.

3,891 stars

Best use case

tokio-async-code-review is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Reviews tokio async runtime usage for task management, sync primitives, channel patterns, and runtime configuration. Use when reviewing Rust code that uses tokio, async/await patterns, spawn, channels, or async synchronization. Also covers tokio-util, tower, and hyper integration patterns.

Teams using tokio-async-code-review should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/tokio-async-code-review/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openclaw/skills/main/skills/anderskev/tokio-async-code-review/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/tokio-async-code-review/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How tokio-async-code-review Compares

Feature / Agenttokio-async-code-reviewStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Reviews tokio async runtime usage for task management, sync primitives, channel patterns, and runtime configuration. Use when reviewing Rust code that uses tokio, async/await patterns, spawn, channels, or async synchronization. Also covers tokio-util, tower, and hyper integration patterns.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

Related Guides

SKILL.md Source

# Tokio Async Code Review

## Review Workflow

1. **Check Cargo.toml** — Note tokio feature flags (`full`, `rt-multi-thread`, `macros`, `sync`, etc.). Missing features cause confusing compile errors.
2. **Check runtime setup** — Is `#[tokio::main]` or manual runtime construction used? Multi-thread vs current-thread?
3. **Scan for blocking** — Search for `std::fs`, `std::net`, `std::thread::sleep`, CPU-heavy loops in async functions.
4. **Check channel usage** — Match channel type to communication pattern (mpsc, broadcast, oneshot, watch).
5. **Check sync primitives** — Verify correct mutex type, proper guard lifetimes, no deadlock potential.

## Output Format

Report findings as:

```text
[FILE:LINE] ISSUE_TITLE
Severity: Critical | Major | Minor | Informational
Description of the issue and why it matters.
```

## Quick Reference

| Issue Type | Reference |
|------------|-----------|
| Task spawning, JoinHandle, structured concurrency | [references/task-management.md](references/task-management.md) |
| Mutex, RwLock, Semaphore, Notify, Barrier | [references/sync-primitives.md](references/sync-primitives.md) |
| mpsc, broadcast, oneshot, watch channel patterns | [references/channels.md](references/channels.md) |

## Review Checklist

### Runtime Configuration
- [ ] Tokio features in Cargo.toml match actual usage
- [ ] Runtime flavor matches workload (`multi_thread` for I/O-bound, `current_thread` for simpler cases)
- [ ] `#[tokio::test]` used for async tests (not manual runtime construction)
- [ ] Worker thread count configured appropriately for production

### Task Management
- [ ] `spawn` return values (`JoinHandle`) are tracked, not silently dropped
- [ ] `spawn_blocking` used for CPU-heavy or synchronous I/O operations
- [ ] Tasks respect cancellation (via `CancellationToken`, `select!`, or shutdown channels)
- [ ] `JoinError` (task panic or cancellation) is handled, not just unwrapped
- [ ] `tokio::select!` branches are cancellation-safe

### Sync Primitives
- [ ] `tokio::sync::Mutex` used when lock is held across `.await`; `std::sync::Mutex` for short non-async sections
- [ ] No mutex guard held across await points (deadlock risk)
- [ ] `Semaphore` used for limiting concurrent operations (not ad-hoc counters)
- [ ] `RwLock` used when read-heavy workload (many readers, infrequent writes)
- [ ] `Notify` used for simple signaling (not channel overhead)

### Channels
- [ ] Channel type matches pattern: mpsc for back-pressure, broadcast for fan-out, oneshot for request-response, watch for latest-value
- [ ] Bounded channels have appropriate capacity (not too small = deadlock, not too large = memory)
- [ ] `SendError` / `RecvError` handled (indicates other side dropped)
- [ ] Broadcast `Lagged` errors handled (receiver fell behind)
- [ ] Channel senders dropped when done to signal completion to receivers

### Timer and Sleep
- [ ] `tokio::time::sleep` used instead of `std::thread::sleep`
- [ ] `tokio::time::timeout` wraps operations that could hang
- [ ] `tokio::time::interval` used correctly (`.tick().await` for periodic work)

## Severity Calibration

### Critical
- Blocking I/O (`std::fs::read`, `std::net::TcpStream`) in async context without `spawn_blocking`
- Mutex guard held across `.await` point (deadlock potential)
- `std::thread::sleep` in async function (blocks runtime thread)
- Unbounded channel where back-pressure is needed (OOM risk)

### Major
- `JoinHandle` silently dropped (lost errors, zombie tasks)
- Missing `select!` cancellation safety consideration
- Wrong mutex type (std vs tokio) for the use case
- Missing timeout on network/external operations

### Minor
- `tokio::spawn` for trivially small async blocks (overhead > benefit)
- Overly large channel buffer without justification
- Manual runtime construction where `#[tokio::main]` suffices
- `std::sync::Mutex` where contention is high enough to benefit from tokio's async mutex

### Informational
- Suggestions to use `tokio-util` utilities (e.g., `CancellationToken`)
- Tower middleware patterns for service composition
- Structured concurrency with `JoinSet`

## Valid Patterns (Do NOT Flag)

- **`std::sync::Mutex` for short critical sections** — tokio docs recommend this when no `.await` is inside the lock
- **`tokio::spawn` without explicit join** — Valid for background tasks with proper shutdown signaling
- **Unbuffered channel capacity of 1** — Valid for synchronization barriers
- **`#[tokio::main(flavor = "current_thread")]` in simple binaries** — Not every app needs multi-thread runtime
- **`clone()` on `Arc<T>` before `spawn`** — Required for moving into tasks, not unnecessary cloning
- **Large broadcast channel capacity** — Valid when lagged errors are expensive (event sourcing)

## Before Submitting Findings

Load and follow `beagle-rust:review-verification-protocol` before reporting any issue.

Related Skills

Post-Mortem & Incident Review Framework

3891
from openclaw/skills

Run structured post-mortems that actually prevent repeat failures. Blameless analysis, root cause identification, and action tracking.

DevOps & Infrastructure

Pitch Deck Reviewer

3891
from openclaw/skills

Reviews pitch decks and provides investor-ready feedback with scoring

Business Strategy & Growth

Performance Review Engine

3891
from openclaw/skills

> Your AI-powered performance management system. Write reviews that develop people, not just evaluate them. From self-assessments to 360° feedback to calibration — complete frameworks for every review cycle.

Workflow & Productivity

Deal Desk — Structured Deal Review & Approval

3891
from openclaw/skills

Run every non-standard deal through a repeatable review process. Catch margin leaks, enforce discount guardrails, and close faster with pre-approved terms.

Contract Review Assistant

3891
from openclaw/skills

Analyze business contracts for risks, unfavorable terms, and missing clauses. Get a plain-English summary of what you're signing.

Legal & Finance

afrexai-code-reviewer

3891
from openclaw/skills

Enterprise-grade code review agent. Reviews PRs, diffs, or code files for security vulnerabilities, performance issues, error handling gaps, architecture smells, and test coverage. Works with any language, any repo, no dependencies required.

Coding & Development

performance-review-cn

3891
from openclaw/skills

绩效面谈报告、OKR对齐度检测、校准辅助

Workflow & Productivity

clawdtm-review

3891
from openclaw/skills

Review and rate OpenClaw skills on ClawdTM. See what humans and AI agents recommend.

General Utilities

cyber-owasp-review

3891
from openclaw/skills

Map application security findings to OWASP Top 10 categories and generate remediation checklists. Use for normalized AppSec review outputs and category-level prioritization.

Security

Contract Reviewer - AI Legal Document Risk Scanner

3891
from openclaw/skills

Upload any contract or legal document and get a structured risk analysis with flagged clauses, plain-language explanations, and negotiation suggestions.

serde-code-review

3891
from openclaw/skills

Reviews serde serialization code for derive patterns, enum representations, custom implementations, and common serialization bugs. Use when reviewing Rust code that uses serde, serde_json, toml, or any serde-based serialization format. Covers attribute macros, field renaming, and format-specific pitfalls.

rust-testing-code-review

3891
from openclaw/skills

Reviews Rust test code for unit test patterns, integration test structure, async testing, mocking approaches, and property-based testing. Use when reviewing _test.rs files,