qa-quarto
Adversarial Quarto vs Beamer QA. Critic finds issues, fixer applies fixes, loops until APPROVED (max 5 rounds).
Best use case
qa-quarto is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Adversarial Quarto vs Beamer QA. Critic finds issues, fixer applies fixes, loops until APPROVED (max 5 rounds).
Teams using qa-quarto should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/qa-quarto/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How qa-quarto Compares
| Feature / Agent | qa-quarto | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Adversarial Quarto vs Beamer QA. Critic finds issues, fixer applies fixes, loops until APPROVED (max 5 rounds).
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
ChatGPT vs Claude for Agent Skills
Compare ChatGPT and Claude for AI agent skills across coding, writing, research, and reusable workflow execution.
SKILL.md Source
# Adversarial Quarto vs Beamer QA Workflow Compare Quarto HTML slides against their Beamer PDF benchmark using an iterative critic/fixer loop. **Philosophy:** The Beamer PDF is the gold standard. The Quarto translation must be at least as good in every dimension. --- ## Workflow ``` Phase 0: Pre-flight → Phase 1: Critic audit → Phase 2: Fixer → Phase 3: Re-audit → Loop until APPROVED (max 5 rounds) ``` ## Hard Gates (Non-Negotiable) | Gate | Condition | |------|-----------| | **Overflow** | NO content cut off | | **Plot Quality** | Interactive charts >= static plots | | **Content Parity** | No missing slides/equations/text | | **Visual Regression** | Quarto >= Beamer in all dimensions | | **Slide Centering** | Content centered, no jumping | | **Notation Fidelity** | All math verbatim from Beamer | ## Phase 0: Pre-flight 1. Locate Beamer (.tex/.pdf) and Quarto (.qmd/.html) files 2. Check freshness (re-render if QMD newer than HTML) 3. Verify TikZ SVGs if applicable ## Phase 1: Initial Audit Launch the `quarto-critic` agent to compare Beamer vs Quarto comprehensively. Report saved to `quality_reports/[Lecture]_qa_critic_round1.md`. ## Phase 2: Fix Cycle If not APPROVED, launch `quarto-fixer` agent to apply fixes (Critical → Major → Minor), re-render, and verify. ## Phase 3: Re-Audit Re-launch critic to verify fixes. Loop back to Phase 2 if needed. ## Iteration Limits Max 5 fix rounds. After that, escalate to user with remaining issues. ## Final Report Save to `quality_reports/[Lecture]_qa_final.md` with hard gate status, iteration summary, and remaining issues.
Related Skills
translate-to-quarto
Translate Beamer LaTeX to Quarto RevealJS. Multi-phase workflow with TikZ extraction and QA.
visual-audit
Perform adversarial visual audit of Quarto or Beamer slides checking for overflow, font consistency, box fatigue, and layout issues.
validate-bib
Validate bibliography entries against citations in all lecture files. Find missing entries and unused references.
slide-excellence
Multi-agent slide review (visual, pedagogy, proofreading). Use for comprehensive quality check before milestones.
review-r
Run the R code review protocol on R scripts. Checks code quality, reproducibility, domain correctness, and professional standards. Produces a report without editing files.
review-paper
Comprehensive manuscript review covering argument structure, econometric specification, citation completeness, and potential referee objections
research-ideation
Generate structured research questions, testable hypotheses, and empirical strategies from a topic or dataset
proofread
Run the proofreading protocol on lecture files. Checks grammar, typos, overflow, consistency, and academic writing quality. Produces a report without editing files.
pedagogy-review
Run holistic pedagogical review on lecture slides. Checks narrative arc, student prerequisites, worked examples, notation clarity, and deck pacing.
lit-review
Structured literature search and synthesis with citation extraction and gap identification
learn
Extract reusable knowledge from the current session into a persistent skill. Use when you discover something non-obvious, create a workaround, or develop a multi-step workflow that future sessions would benefit from.
interview-me
Interactive interview to formalize a research idea into a structured specification with hypotheses and empirical strategy