slide-excellence
Multi-agent slide review (visual, pedagogy, proofreading). Use for comprehensive quality check before milestones.
Best use case
slide-excellence is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Multi-agent slide review (visual, pedagogy, proofreading). Use for comprehensive quality check before milestones.
Teams using slide-excellence should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/slide-excellence/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How slide-excellence Compares
| Feature / Agent | slide-excellence | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Multi-agent slide review (visual, pedagogy, proofreading). Use for comprehensive quality check before milestones.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
ChatGPT vs Claude for Agent Skills
Compare ChatGPT and Claude for AI agent skills across coding, writing, research, and reusable workflow execution.
SKILL.md Source
# Slide Excellence Review Run a comprehensive multi-dimensional review of lecture slides. Multiple agents analyze the file independently, then results are synthesized. ## Steps ### 1. Identify the File Parse `$ARGUMENTS` for the filename. Resolve path in `Quarto/` or `Slides/`. ### 2. Run Review Agents in Parallel **Agent 1: Visual Audit** (slide-auditor) - Overflow, font consistency, box fatigue, spacing, images - Save: `quality_reports/[FILE]_visual_audit.md` **Agent 2: Pedagogical Review** (pedagogy-reviewer) - 13 pedagogical patterns, narrative, pacing, notation - Save: `quality_reports/[FILE]_pedagogy_report.md` **Agent 3: Proofreading** (proofreader) - Grammar, typos, consistency, academic quality, citations - Save: `quality_reports/[FILE]_report.md` **Agent 4: TikZ Review** (only if file contains TikZ) - Label overlaps, geometric accuracy, visual semantics - Save: `quality_reports/[FILE]_tikz_review.md` **Agent 5: Content Parity** (only for .qmd files with corresponding .tex) - Frame count comparison, environment parity, content drift - Save: `quality_reports/[FILE]_parity_report.md` **Agent 6: Substance Review** (optional, for .tex files) - Domain correctness via domain-reviewer protocol - Save: `quality_reports/[FILE]_substance_review.md` ### 3. Synthesize Combined Summary ```markdown # Slide Excellence Review: [Filename] ## Overall Quality Score: [EXCELLENT / GOOD / NEEDS WORK / POOR] | Dimension | Critical | Medium | Low | |-----------|----------|--------|-----| | Visual/Layout | | | | | Pedagogical | | | | | Proofreading | | | | ### Critical Issues (Immediate Action Required) ### Medium Issues (Next Revision) ### Recommended Next Steps ``` ## Quality Score Rubric | Score | Critical | Medium | Meaning | |-------|----------|--------|---------| | Excellent | 0-2 | 0-5 | Ready to present | | Good | 3-5 | 6-15 | Minor refinements | | Needs Work | 6-10 | 16-30 | Significant revision | | Poor | 11+ | 31+ | Major restructuring |
Related Skills
visual-audit
Perform adversarial visual audit of Quarto or Beamer slides checking for overflow, font consistency, box fatigue, and layout issues.
validate-bib
Validate bibliography entries against citations in all lecture files. Find missing entries and unused references.
translate-to-quarto
Translate Beamer LaTeX to Quarto RevealJS. Multi-phase workflow with TikZ extraction and QA.
review-r
Run the R code review protocol on R scripts. Checks code quality, reproducibility, domain correctness, and professional standards. Produces a report without editing files.
review-paper
Comprehensive manuscript review covering argument structure, econometric specification, citation completeness, and potential referee objections
research-ideation
Generate structured research questions, testable hypotheses, and empirical strategies from a topic or dataset
qa-quarto
Adversarial Quarto vs Beamer QA. Critic finds issues, fixer applies fixes, loops until APPROVED (max 5 rounds).
proofread
Run the proofreading protocol on lecture files. Checks grammar, typos, overflow, consistency, and academic writing quality. Produces a report without editing files.
pedagogy-review
Run holistic pedagogical review on lecture slides. Checks narrative arc, student prerequisites, worked examples, notation clarity, and deck pacing.
lit-review
Structured literature search and synthesis with citation extraction and gap identification
learn
Extract reusable knowledge from the current session into a persistent skill. Use when you discover something non-obvious, create a workaround, or develop a multi-step workflow that future sessions would benefit from.
interview-me
Interactive interview to formalize a research idea into a structured specification with hypotheses and empirical strategy