fp-ts-pragmatic
A practical, jargon-free guide to fp-ts functional programming - the 80/20 approach that gets results without the academic overhead. Use when writing TypeScript with fp-ts library.
Best use case
fp-ts-pragmatic is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt. It is especially useful for teams working in multi. A practical, jargon-free guide to fp-ts functional programming - the 80/20 approach that gets results without the academic overhead. Use when writing TypeScript with fp-ts library.
A practical, jargon-free guide to fp-ts functional programming - the 80/20 approach that gets results without the academic overhead. Use when writing TypeScript with fp-ts library.
Users should expect a more consistent workflow output, faster repeated execution, and less time spent rewriting prompts from scratch.
Practical example
Example input
Use the "fp-ts-pragmatic" skill to help with this workflow task. Context: A practical, jargon-free guide to fp-ts functional programming - the 80/20 approach that gets results without the academic overhead. Use when writing TypeScript with fp-ts library.
Example output
A structured workflow result with clearer steps, more consistent formatting, and an output that is easier to reuse in the next run.
When to use this skill
- Use this skill when you want a reusable workflow rather than writing the same prompt again and again.
When not to use this skill
- Do not use this when you only need a one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- Do not use it if you cannot install or maintain the related files, repository context, or supporting tools.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/fp-ts-pragmatic/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How fp-ts-pragmatic Compares
| Feature / Agent | fp-ts-pragmatic | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
A practical, jargon-free guide to fp-ts functional programming - the 80/20 approach that gets results without the academic overhead. Use when writing TypeScript with fp-ts library.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
AI Agent for YouTube Script Writing
Find AI agent skills for YouTube script writing, video research, content outlining, and repeatable channel production workflows.
AI Agents for Marketing
Discover AI agents for marketing workflows, from SEO and content production to campaign research, outreach, and analytics.
SKILL.md Source
# Pragmatic Functional Programming
**Read this first.** This guide cuts through the academic jargon and shows you what actually matters. No category theory. No abstract nonsense. Just patterns that make your code better.
## When to Use This Skill
- When starting with fp-ts and need practical guidance
- When writing TypeScript code that handles nullable values, errors, or async operations
- When you want cleaner, more maintainable functional code without the academic overhead
- When refactoring imperative code to functional style
## The Golden Rule
> **If functional programming makes your code harder to read, don't use it.**
FP is a tool, not a religion. Use it when it helps. Skip it when it doesn't.
---
## The 80/20 of FP
These five patterns give you most of the benefits. Master these before exploring anything else.
### 1. Pipe: Chain Operations Clearly
Instead of nesting function calls or creating intermediate variables, chain operations in reading order.
```typescript
import { pipe } from 'fp-ts/function'
// Before: Hard to read (inside-out)
const result = format(validate(parse(input)))
// Before: Too many variables
const parsed = parse(input)
const validated = validate(parsed)
const result = format(validated)
// After: Clear, linear flow
const result = pipe(
input,
parse,
validate,
format
)
```
**When to use pipe:**
- 3+ transformations on the same data
- You find yourself naming throwaway variables
- Logic reads better top-to-bottom
**When to skip pipe:**
- Just 1-2 operations (direct call is fine)
- The operations don't naturally chain
### 2. Option: Handle Missing Values Without null Checks
Stop writing `if (x !== null && x !== undefined)` everywhere.
```typescript
import * as O from 'fp-ts/Option'
import { pipe } from 'fp-ts/function'
// Before: Defensive null checking
function getUserCity(user: User | null): string {
if (user === null) return 'Unknown'
if (user.address === null) return 'Unknown'
if (user.address.city === null) return 'Unknown'
return user.address.city
}
// After: Chain through potential missing values
const getUserCity = (user: User | null): string =>
pipe(
O.fromNullable(user),
O.flatMap(u => O.fromNullable(u.address)),
O.flatMap(a => O.fromNullable(a.city)),
O.getOrElse(() => 'Unknown')
)
```
**Plain language translation:**
- `O.fromNullable(x)` = "wrap this value, treating null/undefined as 'nothing'"
- `O.flatMap(fn)` = "if we have something, apply this function"
- `O.getOrElse(() => default)` = "unwrap, or use this default if nothing"
### 3. Either: Make Errors Explicit
Stop throwing exceptions for expected failures. Return errors as values.
```typescript
import * as E from 'fp-ts/Either'
import { pipe } from 'fp-ts/function'
// Before: Hidden failure mode
function parseAge(input: string): number {
const age = parseInt(input, 10)
if (isNaN(age)) throw new Error('Invalid age')
if (age < 0) throw new Error('Age cannot be negative')
return age
}
// After: Errors are visible in the type
function parseAge(input: string): E.Either<string, number> {
const age = parseInt(input, 10)
if (isNaN(age)) return E.left('Invalid age')
if (age < 0) return E.left('Age cannot be negative')
return E.right(age)
}
// Using it
const result = parseAge(userInput)
if (E.isRight(result)) {
console.log(`Age is ${result.right}`)
} else {
console.log(`Error: ${result.left}`)
}
```
**Plain language translation:**
- `E.right(value)` = "success with this value"
- `E.left(error)` = "failure with this error"
- `E.isRight(x)` = "did it succeed?"
### 4. Map: Transform Without Unpacking
Transform values inside containers without extracting them first.
```typescript
import * as O from 'fp-ts/Option'
import * as E from 'fp-ts/Either'
import * as A from 'fp-ts/Array'
import { pipe } from 'fp-ts/function'
// Transform inside Option
const maybeUser: O.Option<User> = O.some({ name: 'Alice', age: 30 })
const maybeName: O.Option<string> = pipe(
maybeUser,
O.map(user => user.name)
)
// Transform inside Either
const result: E.Either<Error, number> = E.right(5)
const doubled: E.Either<Error, number> = pipe(
result,
E.map(n => n * 2)
)
// Transform arrays (same concept!)
const numbers = [1, 2, 3]
const doubled = pipe(
numbers,
A.map(n => n * 2)
)
```
### 5. FlatMap: Chain Operations That Might Fail
When each step might fail, chain them together.
```typescript
import * as E from 'fp-ts/Either'
import { pipe } from 'fp-ts/function'
const parseJSON = (s: string): E.Either<string, unknown> =>
E.tryCatch(() => JSON.parse(s), () => 'Invalid JSON')
const extractEmail = (data: unknown): E.Either<string, string> => {
if (typeof data === 'object' && data !== null && 'email' in data) {
return E.right((data as { email: string }).email)
}
return E.left('No email field')
}
const validateEmail = (email: string): E.Either<string, string> =>
email.includes('@') ? E.right(email) : E.left('Invalid email format')
// Chain all steps - if any fails, the whole thing fails
const getValidEmail = (input: string): E.Either<string, string> =>
pipe(
parseJSON(input),
E.flatMap(extractEmail),
E.flatMap(validateEmail)
)
// Success path: Right('user@example.com')
// Any failure: Left('specific error message')
```
**Plain language:** `flatMap` means "if this succeeded, try the next thing"
---
## When NOT to Use FP
Functional programming is not always the answer. Here's when to keep it simple.
### Simple Null Checks
```typescript
// Just use optional chaining - it's built into the language
const city = user?.address?.city ?? 'Unknown'
// DON'T overcomplicate it
const city = pipe(
O.fromNullable(user),
O.flatMap(u => O.fromNullable(u.address)),
O.flatMap(a => O.fromNullable(a.city)),
O.getOrElse(() => 'Unknown')
)
```
### Simple Loops
```typescript
// A for loop is fine when you need early exit or complex logic
function findFirst(items: Item[], predicate: (i: Item) => boolean): Item | null {
for (const item of items) {
if (predicate(item)) return item
}
return null
}
// DON'T force FP when it doesn't help
const result = pipe(
items,
A.findFirst(predicate),
O.toNullable
)
```
### Performance-Critical Code
```typescript
// For hot paths, imperative is faster (no intermediate arrays)
function sumLarge(numbers: number[]): number {
let sum = 0
for (let i = 0; i < numbers.length; i++) {
sum += numbers[i]
}
return sum
}
// fp-ts creates intermediate structures
const sum = pipe(numbers, A.reduce(0, (acc, n) => acc + n))
```
### When Your Team Doesn't Know FP
If you're the only one who can read the code, it's not good code.
```typescript
// If your team knows this pattern
async function getUser(id: string): Promise<User | null> {
try {
const response = await fetch(`/api/users/${id}`)
if (!response.ok) return null
return await response.json()
} catch {
return null
}
}
// Don't force this on them
const getUser = (id: string): TE.TaskEither<Error, User> =>
pipe(
TE.tryCatch(() => fetch(`/api/users/${id}`), E.toError),
TE.flatMap(r => r.ok ? TE.right(r) : TE.left(new Error('Not found'))),
TE.flatMap(r => TE.tryCatch(() => r.json(), E.toError))
)
```
---
## Quick Wins: Easy Changes That Improve Code Today
### 1. Replace Nested Ternaries with pipe + fold
```typescript
// Before: Nested ternary nightmare
const message = user === null
? 'No user'
: user.isAdmin
? `Admin: ${user.name}`
: `User: ${user.name}`
// After: Clear case handling
const message = pipe(
O.fromNullable(user),
O.fold(
() => 'No user',
(u) => u.isAdmin ? `Admin: ${u.name}` : `User: ${u.name}`
)
)
```
### 2. Replace try-catch with tryCatch
```typescript
// Before: try-catch everywhere
let config
try {
config = JSON.parse(rawConfig)
} catch {
config = defaultConfig
}
// After: One-liner
const config = pipe(
E.tryCatch(() => JSON.parse(rawConfig), () => 'parse error'),
E.getOrElse(() => defaultConfig)
)
```
### 3. Replace undefined Returns with Option
```typescript
// Before: Caller might forget to check
function findUser(id: string): User | undefined {
return users.find(u => u.id === id)
}
// After: Type forces caller to handle missing case
function findUser(id: string): O.Option<User> {
return O.fromNullable(users.find(u => u.id === id))
}
```
### 4. Replace Error Strings with Typed Errors
```typescript
// Before: Just strings
function validate(data: unknown): E.Either<string, User> {
// ...
return E.left('validation failed')
}
// After: Structured errors
type ValidationError = {
field: string
message: string
}
function validate(data: unknown): E.Either<ValidationError, User> {
// ...
return E.left({ field: 'email', message: 'Invalid format' })
}
```
### 5. Use const Assertions for Error Types
```typescript
// Create specific error types without classes
const NotFound = (id: string) => ({ _tag: 'NotFound' as const, id })
const Unauthorized = { _tag: 'Unauthorized' as const }
const ValidationFailed = (errors: string[]) =>
({ _tag: 'ValidationFailed' as const, errors })
type AppError =
| ReturnType<typeof NotFound>
| typeof Unauthorized
| ReturnType<typeof ValidationFailed>
// Now you can pattern match
const handleError = (error: AppError): string => {
switch (error._tag) {
case 'NotFound': return `Item ${error.id} not found`
case 'Unauthorized': return 'Please log in'
case 'ValidationFailed': return error.errors.join(', ')
}
}
```
---
## Common Refactors: Before and After
### Callback Hell to Pipe
```typescript
// Before
fetchUser(id, (user) => {
if (!user) return handleNoUser()
fetchPosts(user.id, (posts) => {
if (!posts) return handleNoPosts()
fetchComments(posts[0].id, (comments) => {
render(user, posts, comments)
})
})
})
// After (with TaskEither for async)
import * as TE from 'fp-ts/TaskEither'
const loadData = (id: string) =>
pipe(
fetchUser(id),
TE.flatMap(user => pipe(
fetchPosts(user.id),
TE.map(posts => ({ user, posts }))
)),
TE.flatMap(({ user, posts }) => pipe(
fetchComments(posts[0].id),
TE.map(comments => ({ user, posts, comments }))
))
)
// Execute
const result = await loadData('123')()
pipe(
result,
E.fold(handleError, ({ user, posts, comments }) => render(user, posts, comments))
)
```
### Multiple null Checks to Option Chain
```typescript
// Before
function getManagerEmail(employee: Employee): string | null {
if (!employee.department) return null
if (!employee.department.manager) return null
if (!employee.department.manager.email) return null
return employee.department.manager.email
}
// After
const getManagerEmail = (employee: Employee): O.Option<string> =>
pipe(
O.fromNullable(employee.department),
O.flatMap(d => O.fromNullable(d.manager)),
O.flatMap(m => O.fromNullable(m.email))
)
// Use it
pipe(
getManagerEmail(employee),
O.fold(
() => sendToDefault(),
(email) => sendTo(email)
)
)
```
### Validation with Multiple Checks
```typescript
// Before: Throws on first error
function validateUser(data: unknown): User {
if (!data || typeof data !== 'object') throw new Error('Must be object')
const obj = data as Record<string, unknown>
if (typeof obj.email !== 'string') throw new Error('Email required')
if (!obj.email.includes('@')) throw new Error('Invalid email')
if (typeof obj.age !== 'number') throw new Error('Age required')
if (obj.age < 0) throw new Error('Age must be positive')
return obj as User
}
// After: Returns first error, type-safe
const validateUser = (data: unknown): E.Either<string, User> =>
pipe(
E.Do,
E.bind('obj', () =>
typeof data === 'object' && data !== null
? E.right(data as Record<string, unknown>)
: E.left('Must be object')
),
E.bind('email', ({ obj }) =>
typeof obj.email === 'string' && obj.email.includes('@')
? E.right(obj.email)
: E.left('Valid email required')
),
E.bind('age', ({ obj }) =>
typeof obj.age === 'number' && obj.age >= 0
? E.right(obj.age)
: E.left('Valid age required')
),
E.map(({ email, age }) => ({ email, age }))
)
```
### Promise Chain to TaskEither
```typescript
// Before
async function processOrder(orderId: string): Promise<Receipt> {
const order = await fetchOrder(orderId)
if (!order) throw new Error('Order not found')
const validated = await validateOrder(order)
if (!validated.success) throw new Error(validated.error)
const payment = await processPayment(validated.order)
if (!payment.success) throw new Error('Payment failed')
return generateReceipt(payment)
}
// After
const processOrder = (orderId: string): TE.TaskEither<string, Receipt> =>
pipe(
fetchOrderTE(orderId),
TE.flatMap(order =>
order ? TE.right(order) : TE.left('Order not found')
),
TE.flatMap(validateOrderTE),
TE.flatMap(processPaymentTE),
TE.map(generateReceipt)
)
```
---
## The Readability Rule
Before using any FP pattern, ask: **"Would a junior developer understand this?"**
### Too Clever (Avoid)
```typescript
const result = pipe(
data,
A.filter(flow(prop('status'), equals('active'))),
A.map(flow(prop('value'), multiply(2))),
A.reduce(monoid.concat, monoid.empty),
O.fromPredicate(gt(threshold))
)
```
### Just Right (Prefer)
```typescript
const activeItems = data.filter(item => item.status === 'active')
const doubledValues = activeItems.map(item => item.value * 2)
const total = doubledValues.reduce((sum, val) => sum + val, 0)
const result = total > threshold ? O.some(total) : O.none
```
### The Middle Ground (Often Best)
```typescript
const result = pipe(
data,
A.filter(item => item.status === 'active'),
A.map(item => item.value * 2),
A.reduce(0, (sum, val) => sum + val),
total => total > threshold ? O.some(total) : O.none
)
```
---
## Cheat Sheet
| What you want | Plain language | fp-ts |
|--------------|----------------|-------|
| Handle null/undefined | "Wrap this nullable" | `O.fromNullable(x)` |
| Default for missing | "Use this if nothing" | `O.getOrElse(() => default)` |
| Transform if present | "If something, change it" | `O.map(fn)` |
| Chain nullable operations | "If something, try this" | `O.flatMap(fn)` |
| Return success | "Worked, here's the value" | `E.right(value)` |
| Return failure | "Failed, here's why" | `E.left(error)` |
| Wrap throwing function | "Try this, catch errors" | `E.tryCatch(fn, onError)` |
| Handle both cases | "Do this for error, that for success" | `E.fold(onLeft, onRight)` |
| Chain operations | "Then do this, then that" | `pipe(x, fn1, fn2, fn3)` |
---
## When to Level Up
Once comfortable with these patterns, explore:
1. **TaskEither** - Async operations that can fail (replaces Promise + try/catch)
2. **Validation** - Collect ALL errors instead of stopping at first
3. **Reader** - Dependency injection without classes
4. **Do notation** - Cleaner syntax for multiple bindings
But don't rush. The basics here will handle 80% of real-world scenarios. Get comfortable with these before adding more tools to your belt.
---
## Summary
1. **Use pipe** for 3+ operations
2. **Use Option** for nullable chains
3. **Use Either** for operations that can fail
4. **Use map** to transform wrapped values
5. **Use flatMap** to chain operations that might fail
6. **Skip FP** when it hurts readability
7. **Keep it simple** - if your team can't read it, it's not good codeRelated Skills
nextjs-best-practices
Next.js App Router principles. Server Components, data fetching, routing patterns.
network-101
Configure and test common network services (HTTP, HTTPS, SNMP, SMB) for penetration testing lab environments. Enable hands-on practice with service enumeration, log analysis, and security testing against properly configured target systems.
neon-postgres
Expert patterns for Neon serverless Postgres, branching, connection pooling, and Prisma/Drizzle integration
nanobanana-ppt-skills
AI-powered PPT generation with document analysis and styled images
multi-agent-patterns
This skill should be used when the user asks to "design multi-agent system", "implement supervisor pattern", "create swarm architecture", "coordinate multiple agents", or mentions multi-agent patterns, context isolation, agent handoffs, sub-agents, or parallel agent execution.
monorepo-management
Build efficient, scalable monorepos that enable code sharing, consistent tooling, and atomic changes across multiple packages and applications.
monetization
Estrategia e implementacao de monetizacao para produtos digitais - Stripe, subscriptions, pricing experiments, freemium, upgrade flows, churn prevention, revenue optimization e modelos de negocio SaaS.
modern-javascript-patterns
Comprehensive guide for mastering modern JavaScript (ES6+) features, functional programming patterns, and best practices for writing clean, maintainable, and performant code.
microservices-patterns
Master microservices architecture patterns including service boundaries, inter-service communication, data management, and resilience patterns for building distributed systems.
mcp-builder
Create MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. The quality of an MCP server is measured by how well it enables LLMs to accomplish real-world tasks.
makepad-skills
Makepad UI development skills for Rust apps: setup, patterns, shaders, packaging, and troubleshooting.
m365-agents-py
Microsoft 365 Agents SDK for Python. Build multichannel agents for Teams/M365/Copilot Studio with aiohttp hosting, AgentApplication routing, streaming responses, and MSAL-based auth.