scientific-problem-selection-initial-prompt
Sub-skill of scientific-problem-selection: Initial Prompt (+3).
Best use case
scientific-problem-selection-initial-prompt is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Sub-skill of scientific-problem-selection: Initial Prompt (+3).
Teams using scientific-problem-selection-initial-prompt should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/initial-prompt/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How scientific-problem-selection-initial-prompt Compares
| Feature / Agent | scientific-problem-selection-initial-prompt | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Sub-skill of scientific-problem-selection: Initial Prompt (+3).
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Initial Prompt (+3) ## Initial Prompt Ask: **"Tell me the short version of your question (1-2 sentences)."** ## Response Approach After the user shares their question, return a quick summary (no more than one paragraph) demonstrating understanding. Note the broader context and rephrase the question--highlighting its crux--to confirm alignment with their thinking. ## Follow-up Prompt Then ask: "Now give me a bit more detail. You might include, however briefly: 1. The setting (i.e., is this about a current or future project) 2. A bit more detail about what you're thinking" ## Workflow From there, draw on the specific modules from the problem choice framework most appropriate to the question: - **Skills 1-4** for future project planning (ideation, risk, optimization, parameters) - **Skills 5-7** for current project navigation (decision trees, adversity, inversion) - **Skill 8** for communication and synthesis - **Skill 9** for comprehensive workflow orchestration See the complete reference materials in the `references/` folder. ---
Related Skills
plan-review-prompt-refresh-after-plan-edits
Refresh reviewer prompt files from the latest on-disk plan before every adversarial re-review. Prevents Codex/Gemini from critiquing stale plan text after local edits.
label-driven-prompt-generation-architecture
Pattern for building automation scripts that classify GitHub issues into prompt templates using label-based routing and extract contextual data for batch processing
agent-team-prompt-generation
Create self-contained execution prompts that define multi-role workflows for Codex sessions without external dependencies
live-state-aware-overnight-implementation-prompts
Design overnight implementation prompts that begin with a live repo/CI precheck so workers continue from partial progress instead of replaying stale handoffs.
lodging-selection
Use when recommending lodging inside a trip plan. Encodes the hotel-vs-Airbnb decision matrix, walk-distance gates, never-fabricate-listings rule, and the specific search-criteria template for Airbnb/Vrbo entries. Invoked by trip-planner.
single-terminal-gh-issue-prompts
Generate live issue-specific Codex prompts for a single terminal, with repo-aware path contracts and plan-gate safety checks.
provider-review-prompt-path-guard
Prevent adversarial review dispatch failures caused by sandbox/tmp path mismatches and provider CLI working-directory drift when launching Codex or Gemini with prompt files.
plan-resubmit-wave-prompts
Run a planning-only multi-terminal wave to harden blocked `status:plan-review` issues for fresh adversarial re-review, with zero implementation work and explicit path ownership.
overnight-parallel-agent-prompts
Design self-contained prompts for 3-5 terminals to run overnight without supervision. Ensures zero git contention, provider-optimal allocation, and a clear morning deliverable summary.
adversarial-review-prompt-refresh-guard
Prevent stale plan/code review prompts from being sent to Codex/Gemini after the underlying artifact changed.
absolute-path-review-prompt-dispatch
Prevent adversarial review dispatch failures caused by relative prompt paths, superseded background sessions, and stale completion notices when launching Codex/Gemini review jobs.
scientific-problem-selection
Systematic framework for scientific problem selection, project ideation, troubleshooting stuck projects, and strategic research decisions.