comm-lit-review-claude-single
Communications-domain literature review with Claude-style knowledge-base-first retrieval. Use when the task is about communications, wireless, networking, satellite/NTN, Wi-Fi, cellular, transport protocols, congestion control, routing, scheduling, MAC/PHY, rate adaptation, channel estimation, beamforming, or communication-system research and the user wants papers, related work, a survey, or a landscape summary. Search Zotero, Obsidian, and local paper folders first when available, then search IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, ACM Digital Library, and broader web in that order.
Best use case
comm-lit-review-claude-single is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Communications-domain literature review with Claude-style knowledge-base-first retrieval. Use when the task is about communications, wireless, networking, satellite/NTN, Wi-Fi, cellular, transport protocols, congestion control, routing, scheduling, MAC/PHY, rate adaptation, channel estimation, beamforming, or communication-system research and the user wants papers, related work, a survey, or a landscape summary. Search Zotero, Obsidian, and local paper folders first when available, then search IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, ACM Digital Library, and broader web in that order.
Teams using comm-lit-review-claude-single should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/comm-lit-review/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How comm-lit-review-claude-single Compares
| Feature / Agent | comm-lit-review-claude-single | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Communications-domain literature review with Claude-style knowledge-base-first retrieval. Use when the task is about communications, wireless, networking, satellite/NTN, Wi-Fi, cellular, transport protocols, congestion control, routing, scheduling, MAC/PHY, rate adaptation, channel estimation, beamforming, or communication-system research and the user wants papers, related work, a survey, or a landscape summary. Search Zotero, Obsidian, and local paper folders first when available, then search IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, ACM Digital Library, and broader web in that order.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
ChatGPT vs Claude for Agent Skills
Compare ChatGPT and Claude for AI agent skills across coding, writing, research, and reusable workflow execution.
SKILL.md Source
# Comm Lit Review Claude Single Research topic: $ARGUMENTS ## Purpose Use this skill for communications-domain literature review when the topic is about: - wireless communications - cellular systems, `4G/5G/6G`, `NR`, `NTN` - satellite, `LEO`, `GEO`, integrated space-air-ground systems - Wi-Fi, WLAN, mesh, ad hoc, sidelink, V2X - routing, scheduling, resource allocation, beamforming - rate adaptation, link adaptation, `ACM`, `HARQ`, `CSI` feedback - transport protocols and congestion control in communication networks - cross-layer optimization for communication systems If the center of gravity is generic ML architecture research, pure control theory without communications literature, or software/API documentation rather than papers, fall back to a general literature skill. ## Constants - **PAPER_LIBRARY**: Check local PDFs in this order: 1. `papers/` in the current project 2. `literature/` in the current project 3. Custom path specified by the user in `CLAUDE.md` under `## Paper Library` - **MAX_LOCAL_PAPERS = 20**: Maximum number of local PDFs to scan. If there are more, prioritize by filename and first-page relevance. ## Source Selection Parse `$ARGUMENTS` for a `— sources:` directive. - If `— sources:` is specified, only search the listed sources. - If not specified, default to: - `zotero` - `obsidian` - `local` - `ieee` - `sciencedirect` - `acm` - `web` Valid source values: - `zotero` - `obsidian` - `local` - `ieee` - `sciencedirect` - `acm` - `web` - `all` If `all` is specified, interpret it as the full default source set. ## Retrieval Order This is a knowledge-base-first skill. Search in this order unless the user overrides it: 1. `Zotero` 2. `Obsidian` 3. local `papers/` and `literature/` 4. `IEEE Xplore` 5. `ScienceDirect` 6. `ACM Digital Library` 7. broader web Graceful degradation rules: - If a source is unavailable, do not fail. - Skip it silently. - Continue to the next source. ## External Search Policy For external search: - prefer `IEEE Xplore` first - then `ScienceDirect` - then `ACM` - then broader web only when needed Publication policy: - prefer peer-reviewed journals and major conferences - label workshop papers as `workshop` - label arXiv-only or author-hosted versions as `preprint` - if both preprint and formal version exist, cite the formal version first Time-window policy: - if the user does not specify a year range, include both a short foundational set and a recent set - recommended split: - `foundational`: before 2022 - `recent`: 2022 to present ## Venue Priority Within each database tier, search venue tiers in this order. ### Tier A Journals: - `IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications (JSAC)` - `IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (ToN)` - `IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications (TWC)` - `IEEE Transactions on Communications (TCOM)` Conferences: - `ACM SIGCOMM` - `USENIX NSDI` - `ACM MobiCom` - `ACM CoNEXT` - `IEEE INFOCOM` ### Tier B Journals: - `IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology (TVT)` - `IEEE Wireless Communications Letters (WCL)` - `IEEE Communications Letters` - `Computer Networks` - `Computer Communications` - `Ad Hoc Networks` - `Physical Communication` Conferences: - `IEEE ICC` - `IEEE GLOBECOM` - `IEEE WCNC` - `IEEE PIMRC` - `ACM MobiHoc` ### Tier C - other relevant IEEE journals and transactions - other relevant Elsevier journals - other clearly relevant ACM conferences and workshops - topic-specific satellite, optical, vehicular, IoT, aerial, or edge communications venues Usage rules: - start from Tier A - widen to Tier B if needed - widen to Tier C if still sparse - only then broaden to full web search - by default this is a soft priority, not a hard whitelist - if the user says `only top venues`, `top journals only`, or `top conferences only`, treat Tier A as a hard filter ## Workflow ### Step 0a: Search Zotero Library Skip this step if Zotero MCP is not configured or `zotero` is not enabled. If available: 1. search by topic 2. capture title, authors, year, venue 3. pull user annotations, tags, or collections when present 4. treat these as high-priority evidence because they reflect the user's existing library ### Step 0b: Search Obsidian Vault Skip this step if Obsidian MCP is not configured or `obsidian` is not enabled. If available: 1. search topic-related notes 2. collect summaries, wikilinks, tags, and paper references 3. treat these notes as the user's processed understanding of the topic ### Step 0c: Scan Local Paper Library Run this step if `local` is enabled. 1. locate PDFs from `papers/**/*.pdf` and `literature/**/*.pdf` 2. de-duplicate against Zotero hits when possible 3. read the first pages of relevant PDFs 4. extract title, authors, year, problem, method, and relevance 5. use local hits to guide and de-duplicate later external search ### Step 1: Search External Primary Sources Use a layered search strategy. For communications topics, avoid random blog posts or tertiary summaries. Database ladder: 1. `ieeexplore.ieee.org` 2. `sciencedirect.com` 3. `dl.acm.org` 4. broader web using primary publisher pages, official conference sites, DOI pages, and author-hosted copies of already-identified formal papers Move to the next database tier only when: - the higher-priority tier is too sparse - the topic clearly publishes elsewhere - the user explicitly asks for broader coverage Within each database tier: 1. start from Tier A venues 2. widen to Tier B if needed 3. widen to Tier C if still sparse ### Step 2: Extract Paper-Level Facts For each relevant paper, capture: - Title - Authors - Year - Venue - Layer or system scope - Scenario and assumptions - Core method - Main result or claim - Limitation - Relevance to the user's topic - Source URL - Source origin: `zotero`, `obsidian`, `local`, `ieee`, `sciencedirect`, `acm`, or `web` Favor concrete numbers, assumptions, and problem definitions over generic paraphrases. Do not collapse transport-layer rate control and PHY/MAC rate adaptation into one bucket without saying so explicitly. ## Synthesis Rules Group papers by technical axis rather than by search order. Common groupings: - `PHY/MAC` adaptation - transport and congestion control - `NTN` and satellite resource management - cross-layer or learning-based control - measurement and empirical studies When useful, explicitly separate: - foundational vs recent work - formal publications vs preprints - top-tier vs lower-tier venues - single-link vs multi-user formulations - simulation-only vs deployment-backed work - user-owned sources vs newly surfaced external papers If evidence is weak, say so instead of smoothing it over. ## Output Use a literature table with these columns: | Paper | Venue | Year | Layer | Scenario | Method | Key Result | Limitation | Relevance | Source | |---|---|---:|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| `Source` should indicate where the paper came from first: - `zotero` - `obsidian` - `local` - `ieee` - `sciencedirect` - `acm` - `web` After the table, summarize in this order: 1. what the field is mostly trying to solve 2. how papers cluster into `2-4` approaches 3. what the user already had vs what was newly surfaced 4. where the evidence is strong vs weak 5. what research gap remains End with `Practical Takeaway`: - dominant current approach - likely saturated direction - promising open direction ## Key Rules - Never fail because Zotero or Obsidian MCP is missing. - Prefer user-owned sources first when available, but do not let them replace external validation. - Prefer primary formal sources over summaries or tertiary commentary. - Prefer `IEEE` and `ScienceDirect` first, `ACM` second, and only then broader web search unless the user asks otherwise. - Search venue tiers from top to broad within each database tier. - Treat venue tiers as soft ranking by default and hard constraint only when the user explicitly asks for top-only search. - Do not pretend a preprint is peer reviewed. - If the topic spans multiple layers, say that the literature itself is split across layers.
Related Skills
research-review
Get a deep critical review of research from GPT via Codex MCP. Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.
auto-review-loop
Autonomous multi-round research review loop. Repeatedly reviews via Codex MCP, implements fixes, and re-reviews until positive assessment or max rounds reached. Use when user says "auto review loop", "review until it passes", or wants autonomous iterative improvement.
auto-review-loop-minimax
Autonomous multi-round research review loop using MiniMax API. Use when you want to use MiniMax instead of Codex MCP for external review. Trigger with "auto review loop minimax" or "minimax review".
auto-review-loop-llm
Autonomous research review loop using any OpenAI-compatible LLM API. Configure via llm-chat MCP server or environment variables. Trigger with "auto review loop llm" or "llm review".
vast-gpu
Rent, manage, and destroy GPU instances on vast.ai. Use when user says "rent gpu", "vast.ai", "rent a server", "cloud gpu", or needs on-demand GPU without owning hardware.
system-profile
Profile a target (script, process, GPU, memory, interconnect) using external tools and code instrumentation. Produces structured performance reports with actionable recommendations. Use when user says "profile", "benchmark", "bottleneck", or wants performance analysis.
training-check
Periodically check WandB metrics during training to catch problems early (NaN, loss divergence, idle GPUs). Avoids wasting GPU hours on broken runs. Use when training is running and you want automated health checks.
serverless-modal
Run GPU workloads on Modal — training, fine-tuning, inference, batch processing. Zero-config serverless: no SSH, no Docker, auto scale-to-zero. Use when user says "modal run", "modal training", "modal inference", "deploy to modal", "need a GPU", "run on modal", "serverless GPU", or needs remote GPU compute.
semantic-scholar
Search published venue papers (IEEE, ACM, Springer, etc.) via Semantic Scholar API. Complements /arxiv (preprints) with citation counts, venue metadata, and TLDR. Use when user says "search semantic scholar", "find IEEE papers", "find journal papers", "venue papers", "citation search", or wants published literature beyond arXiv preprints.
run-experiment
Deploy and run ML experiments on local, remote, Vast.ai, or Modal serverless GPU. Use when user says "run experiment", "deploy to server", "跑实验", or needs to launch training jobs.
result-to-claim
Use when experiments complete to judge what claims the results support, what they don't, and what evidence is still missing. Codex MCP evaluates results against intended claims and routes to next action (pivot, supplement, or confirm). Use after experiments finish — before writing the paper or running ablations.
research-refine
Turn a vague research direction into a problem-anchored, elegant, frontier-aware, implementation-oriented method plan via iterative GPT-5.4 review. Use when the user says "refine my approach", "帮我细化方案", "decompose this problem", "打磨idea", "refine research plan", "细化研究方案", or wants a concrete research method that stays simple, focused, and top-venue ready instead of a vague or overbuilt idea.