meta-results-sensitivity-analysis

Generates the "Results" section for meta-analysis sensitivity analysis based on statistical tables and titles. Use when the user wants to describe sensitivity analysis results or format sensitivity tables for a meta-analysis paper.

53 stars

Best use case

meta-results-sensitivity-analysis is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Generates the "Results" section for meta-analysis sensitivity analysis based on statistical tables and titles. Use when the user wants to describe sensitivity analysis results or format sensitivity tables for a meta-analysis paper.

Teams using meta-results-sensitivity-analysis should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/meta-results-sensitivity-analysis/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills/main/scientific-skills/Academic Writing/meta-results-sensitivity-analysis/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/meta-results-sensitivity-analysis/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How meta-results-sensitivity-analysis Compares

Feature / Agentmeta-results-sensitivity-analysisStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Generates the "Results" section for meta-analysis sensitivity analysis based on statistical tables and titles. Use when the user wants to describe sensitivity analysis results or format sensitivity tables for a meta-analysis paper.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

> **Source**: [https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills](https://github.com/aipoch/medical-research-skills)
## When to Use

Use this skill when:
1.  The user provides a sensitivity analysis table (Leave-One-Out) and wants a textual description.
2.  The user needs to format the "Results" section for a meta-analysis paper regarding sensitivity checks.
3.  The user specifies a target language (Chinese or English) for the output.

## Key Features

- Scope-focused workflow aligned to: Generates the "Results" section for meta-analysis sensitivity analysis based on statistical tables and titles. Use when the user wants to describe sensitivity analysis results or format sensitivity tables for a meta-analysis paper.
- Packaged executable path(s): `scripts/validate_skill.py`.
- Structured execution path designed to keep outputs consistent and reviewable.

## Dependencies

- `Python`: `3.10+`. Repository baseline for current packaged skills.
- `Third-party packages`: `not explicitly version-pinned in this skill package`. Add pinned versions if this skill needs stricter environment control.

## Example Usage

See `## Usage` above for related details.

```bash
cd "20260316/scientific-skills/Academic Writing/meta-results-sensitivity-analysis"
python -m py_compile scripts/validate_skill.py
python scripts/validate_skill.py --help
```

Example run plan:
1. Confirm the user input, output path, and any required config values.
2. Edit the in-file `CONFIG` block or documented parameters if the script uses fixed settings.
3. Run `python scripts/validate_skill.py` with the validated inputs.
4. Review the generated output and return the final artifact with any assumptions called out.

## Implementation Details

See `## Workflow` above for related details.

- Execution model: validate the request, choose the packaged workflow, and produce a bounded deliverable.
- Input controls: confirm the source files, scope limits, output format, and acceptance criteria before running any script.
- Primary implementation surface: `scripts/validate_skill.py`.
- Parameters to clarify first: input path, output path, scope filters, thresholds, and any domain-specific constraints.
- Output discipline: keep results reproducible, identify assumptions explicitly, and avoid undocumented side effects.

## Validation Shortcut

Run this minimal command first to verify the supported execution path:

```bash
python scripts/validate_skill.py --help
```

# Meta Sensitivity Analysis Generator

This skill generates a descriptive "Results" section for meta-analysis sensitivity analysis. It processes statistical tables (Leave-One-Out method), generates a textual description using an LLM, and formats the output with proper table citations and legends.

## Workflow

1.  **Generate Description**: The LLM describes the sensitivity analysis table based on the meta-analysis title and outcome name.
2.  **Format Output**: A script inserts the table citation (e.g., `(Table 5)`) and formats the table with a standard legend.

## Usage

### Input Parameters

*   `title` (optional): Title of the meta-analysis.
*   `sensitivity_table` (optional): The raw statistical table data.
*   `language` (required): Output language (`Chinese` or `English`).
*   `outcome_name` (optional): Name of the outcome indicator.

### Example

```python
from scripts.format_result import format_sensitivity_result

# 1. LLM generates the description (simulated)

# description = llm.generate(prompt="Describe the sensitivity table...", context=inputs)

# 2. Script formats the final result

# final_output = format_sensitivity_result(

#     text=description,

#     table_data=inputs['sensitivity_table'],

#     language=inputs['language']

# )
```

## Quality Rules

1.  **Language**: Output must be strictly in the user-specified language.
2.  **Formatting**: Remove any JSON formatting from LLM output.
3.  **Citation**: Must insert table citation (Table 5) before the last punctuation of the description.

## When Not to Use

- Do not use this skill when the required source data, identifiers, files, or credentials are missing.
- Do not use this skill when the user asks for fabricated results, unsupported claims, or out-of-scope conclusions.
- Do not use this skill when a simpler direct answer is more appropriate than the documented workflow.

## Required Inputs

- A clearly specified task goal aligned with the documented scope.
- All required files, identifiers, parameters, or environment variables before execution.
- Any domain constraints, formatting requirements, and expected output destination if applicable.

## Output Contract

- Return a structured deliverable that is directly usable without reformatting.
- If a file is produced, prefer a deterministic output name such as `meta_results_sensitivity_analysis_result.md` unless the skill documentation defines a better convention.
- Include a short validation summary describing what was checked, what assumptions were made, and any remaining limitations.

## Validation and Safety Rules

- Validate required inputs before execution and stop early when mandatory fields or files are missing.
- Do not fabricate measurements, references, findings, or conclusions that are not supported by the provided source material.
- Emit a clear warning when credentials, privacy constraints, safety boundaries, or unsupported requests affect the result.
- Keep the output safe, reproducible, and within the documented scope at all times.

## Failure Handling

- If validation fails, explain the exact missing field, file, or parameter and show the minimum fix required.
- If an external dependency or script fails, surface the command path, likely cause, and the next recovery step.
- If partial output is returned, label it clearly and identify which checks could not be completed.

## Quick Validation

Run this minimal verification path before full execution when possible:

```text
No local script validation step is required for this skill.
```

Expected output format:

```text
Result file: meta_results_sensitivity_analysis_result.md
Validation summary: PASS/FAIL with brief notes
Assumptions: explicit list if any
```

## Deterministic Output Rules

- Use the same section order for every supported request of this skill.
- Keep output field names stable and do not rename documented keys across examples.
- If a value is unavailable, emit an explicit placeholder instead of omitting the field.

## Completion Checklist

- Confirm all required inputs were present and valid.
- Confirm the supported execution path completed without unresolved errors.
- Confirm the final deliverable matches the documented format exactly.
- Confirm assumptions, limitations, and warnings are surfaced explicitly.

Related Skills

meta-protocol-writer

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Generates a PROSPERO-compliant Meta-analysis protocol based on Title and PICOS. Use when the user wants to write a protocol for a systematic review or meta-analysis.

meta-search-builder

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Medical literature search strategy generator. Given a user's natural-language description (e.g., meta-analysis topic, PICOS elements, research question), automatically extract medical entities (disease, intervention, population, outcomes) and generate professional search queries for seven major databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP). Useful for developing search strategies for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

research-hotspot-analysis

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Analyzes research hotspots and recommends literature based on a disease or topic. Use when the user wants to identify current research trends, hot topics, or get literature recommendations for a specific medical field or disease.

survival-analysis-km

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis tool for clinical and biological research. Generates publication-ready survival curves with statistical tests.

statistical-analysis

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Guided statistical analysis for test selection, assumption checks, power analysis, and APA-style reporting. Use when you need to choose an appropriate statistical test for your data and produce publication-ready results (including effect sizes and diagnostics).

statistical-analysis-advisor

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Recommends appropriate statistical methods (T-test vs ANOVA, etc.) based.

neuropixels-analysis

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

End-to-end Neuropixels extracellular electrophysiology analysis (SpikeGLX/Open Ephys/NWB) including preprocessing, motion correction, Kilosort4 spike sorting, QC metrics, and Allen/IBL-style curation; use when processing Neuropixels recordings or when users mention Neuropixels, SpikeGLX, Open Ephys, Kilosort, quality metrics, drift/motion correction, or unit curation.

metagenomic-krona-chart

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Analyze data with `metagenomic-krona-chart` using a reproducible workflow, explicit validation, and structured outputs for review-ready interpretation.

metabolomics-workbench-database

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Access NIH Metabolomics Workbench (4,200+ studies) via REST API. Query metabolites, RefMet nomenclature, MS/NMR data, m/z search, study metadata for metabolomics and biomarker discovery.

meta-title-generator

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Generates Meta-Analysis research titles based on user keywords, utilizing PubMed search results if available, or creative generation otherwise. Use when the user wants to brainstorm or generate titles for a meta-analysis, specifically starting from keywords or a topic.

meta-sensitivity-plot

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Generate leave-one-out sensitivity analysis plots for meta-analysis. Input is a CSV file containing meta-analysis data; outputs are a sensitivity forest plot (PNG) and a sensitivity data table (CSV) showing pooled effect estimates after excluding each study in turn.

meta-screening-fulltext

53
from aipoch/medical-research-skills

Screen full-text papers against inclusion/exclusion criteria, with optional PubMed metadata check using PMID. Use when the user needs to evaluate a paper for a meta-analysis.