dischargeability-complaint

Drafts a U.S. bankruptcy adversary complaint under 11 U.S.C. §523 to determine non-dischargeability of debt. Use when a creditor, assignee, or subrogee needs a complaint for Bankruptcy Court with §523 theories (fraud, fiduciary defalcation, willful/malicious injury). Trigger when inputs include debtor case data, petition/§341 dates, transaction facts, and target §523 subsections.

11 stars

Best use case

dischargeability-complaint is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.

Drafts a U.S. bankruptcy adversary complaint under 11 U.S.C. §523 to determine non-dischargeability of debt. Use when a creditor, assignee, or subrogee needs a complaint for Bankruptcy Court with §523 theories (fraud, fiduciary defalcation, willful/malicious injury). Trigger when inputs include debtor case data, petition/§341 dates, transaction facts, and target §523 subsections.

Teams using dischargeability-complaint should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.

When to use this skill

  • You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.

When not to use this skill

  • You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
  • You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.

Installation

Claude Code / Cursor / Codex

$curl -o ~/.claude/skills/dischargeability-complaint/SKILL.md --create-dirs "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CaseMark/skills/main/skills/legal/dischargeability-complaint/SKILL.md"

Manual Installation

  1. Download SKILL.md from GitHub
  2. Place it in .claude/skills/dischargeability-complaint/SKILL.md inside your project
  3. Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill

How dischargeability-complaint Compares

Feature / Agentdischargeability-complaintStandard Approach
Platform SupportNot specifiedLimited / Varies
Context Awareness High Baseline
Installation ComplexityUnknownN/A

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill do?

Drafts a U.S. bankruptcy adversary complaint under 11 U.S.C. §523 to determine non-dischargeability of debt. Use when a creditor, assignee, or subrogee needs a complaint for Bankruptcy Court with §523 theories (fraud, fiduciary defalcation, willful/malicious injury). Trigger when inputs include debtor case data, petition/§341 dates, transaction facts, and target §523 subsections.

Where can I find the source code?

You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.

SKILL.md Source

# Dischargeability Complaint

Drafts a court-ready adversary complaint under 11 U.S.C. §523 for U.S. bankruptcy proceedings, with jurisdiction/venue allegations, evidence-anchored counts, and FRBP compliance.

## Quick Start

Collect before drafting:

- **Standing**: Plaintiff's enforcement right (original creditor, assignee, successor, subrogee)
- **Case data**: Court, case number, chapter, petition date, first §341 date, conversion status
- **Deadline posture**: FRBP 4007(c) timing — confirm filing window or extension basis
- **Evidence**: Contracts, account records, correspondence, payment history, admissions, fiduciary documents
- **§523 theories**: Map each subsection to its required elements under controlling circuit law
- **Damages**: Principal, contractual interest, statutory interest, fees, costs
- **Local rules**: Caption format, paragraph style, line numbering, font/margins, filing protocol

## Core Workflow

### 1. Build complaint scaffold

| Section | Content | Verify |
|---|---|---|
| Caption | Court name, bankruptcy case no., adversary caption, parties | District matches debtor case |
| Jurisdiction/Venue | 28 U.S.C. §§1334, 157(b)(2)(I), 1409; core proceeding | Explicitly alleged |
| Parties | Names, addresses, standing chain | Standing complete |
| Procedural posture | Petition date, §341 date, Rule 4007(c) timing | Within deadline or extension stated |
| Factual narrative | Chronological facts with dates and sources | Each allegation tied to exhibit |
| Counts | Per-theory allegations for each §523 subsection | All elements and remedies included |
| Prayer | Non-dischargeability, amount, interest, fees, costs | Amounts traceable to evidence |
| Verification | Perjury statement and signature block | Authorized signer confirmed |
| Service checklist | Filing-ready package | Complete |

### 2. Plead theory-specific elements

| Theory | Elements | Style |
|---|---|---|
| §523(a)(2)(A) | False representation, scienter, reliance, proximate causation, damages | Fact-dense: who/what/when/where/how |
| §523(a)(2)(B) | Materially untrue financial statement | Attach supporting financials, explain materiality |
| §523(a)(4) | Express fiduciary relationship, breach, fraud/defalcation | Distinguish express fiduciary duty from contractual/statutory |
| §523(a)(6) | Willful and malicious injury | Show intentional conduct + substantial certainty of harm |

### 3. Apply paragraph construction rules

- Number all paragraphs; keep short-to-medium length for readability.
- Fraud allegations must satisfy Rule 9(b): identify statement, communicator, medium, date, and falsity.
- Incorporate prior paragraphs by reference at each count's start.
- Use separate counts per theory — prevents collapse if one fails.
- Cross-reference facts; do not repeat full blocks.

### 4. Produce mandatory sections

1. Complaint heading and title
2. Jurisdiction and venue
3. Parties / standing
4. Factual background
5. Procedural timing
6. Count I: §523(a)(2)(A)
7. Count II: §523(a)(4) *(if applicable)*
8. Count III: §523(a)(6) *(if applicable)*
9. Prayer for relief
10. Verification
11. Signature block
12. Service/filing checklist

## Legal Constraints

- **FRBP 7001**: Adversary proceeding form governs structure.
- **FRBP 7009 / Rule 9(b)**: Heightened pleading for fraud allegations.
- **FRBP 7012 / Rule 12(b)(6)**: Frame for plausibility to resist dismissal.
- **FRCP 11**: Remove weak, conclusory, or unsupported allegations — sanctions exposure.

## Pitfalls and Checks

- Reconcile all damages figures against attached evidence.
- Confirm every element has at least one direct fact anchor.
- No allegation may rest on speculation — separate facts from legal inference.
- Do not mix circuit authority; use only jurisdiction-verified standards.
- Do not plead causes outside §523 scope.
- Keep tone objective — factual allegations only, no inflammatory language.
- Include `[VERIFY]` placeholders for unresolved legal standards or local-rule citations.
- Confirm attorney signature, bar status, and filing authorization before finalizing.
- Preserve exhibit organization and authentication trail.

---

Related Skills

wrongful-termination-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts wrongful termination complaints for employment litigation. Covers at-will exceptions, statutory claims (Title VII, ADA, ADEA, FMLA, state equivalents), public policy violations, and whistleblower protections. Use when drafting or filing a wrongful termination complaint or related employment discharge claim.

third-party-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts a Third-Party Complaint (impleader) under FRCP 14 or state equivalents. Use when a defendant needs to implead a party for indemnification, contribution, subrogation, or breach of warranty during the pleadings phase.

specific-performance-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts a Complaint for Specific Performance compelling contractual fulfillment through equitable relief. Use when filing suit for specific performance, real estate breach, unique property disputes, or equitable remedy pleadings.

retaliation-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts U.S. employment-retaliation complaints with jurisdiction, causation, and remedy sections aligned to the governing statute. Use when counsel needs a filing-ready complaint after a plaintiff alleges adverse action following protected activity. Covers Title VII, FLSA, SOX, and Dodd-Frank retaliation claims, administrative-exhaustion preservation, and prayer-for-relief drafting.

quiet-title-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts a court-ready Complaint to Quiet Title for real property disputes. Guides through intake, chain-of-title verification, adverse claim identification, and strategic pleading. Use when drafting quiet title complaints, clearing title defects, challenging adverse possession, resolving boundary disputes, removing invalid liens, or establishing superior title.

purchase-agreement-breach-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts a U.S. civil complaint for breach of a real estate purchase agreement, covering jurisdiction, venue, parties, contract terms, breach allegations, damages, and remedies including specific performance. Use when preparing a breach of purchase agreement complaint, real estate contract dispute pleading, or specific performance action.

patent-infringement-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts a federal patent infringement complaint for U.S. District Court satisfying FRCP Rules 8, 10, 11 and Twombly/Iqbal plausibility. Covers direct (§ 271(a)), induced (§ 271(b)), and contributory (§ 271(c)) infringement with TC Heartland venue analysis and Halo willfulness. Use when initiating patent infringement litigation, drafting an IP complaint, or preparing a pleading to survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion.

partition-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts a U.S. civil complaint for partition of real property by co-owners, pleading jurisdiction, ownership interests, property description, encumbrances, and grounds for partition in kind or by sale. Trigger when the user needs a partition action, co-owner dispute complaint, tenant-in-common or joint-tenancy division, or court-ordered sale of real property.

inverse-condemnation-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts inverse condemnation complaints seeking just compensation for government takings without formal eminent domain. Use when a user needs a takings clause complaint, inverse condemnation pleading, or property rights constitutional claim involving physical, regulatory, or temporary takings.

fraudulent-conveyance-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts a U.S. fraudulent conveyance complaint to avoid and recover debtor asset transfers under UFTA, UVTA, or state equivalents. Covers actual fraud (UVTA § 4(a)(1)), constructive fraud theories, badges of fraud, provisional remedies, and full prayer for relief. Use when a creditor needs to challenge a transfer made to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors, including bankruptcy adversary proceedings. Triggers: fraudulent conveyance, fraudulent transfer, voidable transaction, badges of fraud, asset concealment, debtor insolvency, UFTA, UVTA, avoidance action.

foreclosure-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts U.S. judicial foreclosure complaints pleading standing, chain of title, default, and amounts due with jurisdiction-specific compliance and exhibit control. Triggered when the user needs a foreclosure complaint, mortgage foreclosure pleading, note-and-mortgage enforcement action, or default-based real estate litigation involving acceleration, standing, or lost-note issues.

fmla-complaint

11
from CaseMark/skills

Drafts litigation-ready FMLA violation complaints under 29 U.S.C. § 2617 for federal court or DOL filing. Covers eligibility, interference, retaliation, notice timelines, and damages. Use when drafting FMLA complaints, family medical leave interference claims, FMLA retaliation pleadings, or employment leave violation actions.