resume-handoff
Resume work from a handoff document. **ALWAYS use when** the user says 'resume handoff', 'pick up where we left off', 'continue from handoff', or provides a handoff document path. Verifies current codebase state against handoff, validates changes, and creates an action plan.
Best use case
resume-handoff is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
Resume work from a handoff document. **ALWAYS use when** the user says 'resume handoff', 'pick up where we left off', 'continue from handoff', or provides a handoff document path. Verifies current codebase state against handoff, validates changes, and creates an action plan.
Teams using resume-handoff should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/resume-handoff/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How resume-handoff Compares
| Feature / Agent | resume-handoff | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Resume work from a handoff document. **ALWAYS use when** the user says 'resume handoff', 'pick up where we left off', 'continue from handoff', or provides a handoff document path. Verifies current codebase state against handoff, validates changes, and creates an action plan.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
SKILL.md Source
# Resume work from a handoff document
## Prerequisites
```bash
# Check project setup (thoughts, CLAUDE.md snippet, config)
if [[ -f "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/check-project-setup.sh" ]]; then
"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/check-project-setup.sh" || exit 1
fi
# Auto-discover most recent handoff. Three-source waterfall:
# 1. CATALYST_HANDOFF_PATH env var (CTL-484 continuation-worker contract —
# set by orchestrate-revive's continuation branch when it spawns
# `claude --bg --resume` after a turn-cap exhaustion).
# 2. workflow-context.sh recent handoffs (interactive flows).
# 3. (handled later in Step 4) interactive picker.
RECENT_HANDOFF=""
if [[ -n "${CATALYST_HANDOFF_PATH:-}" && -f "$CATALYST_HANDOFF_PATH" ]]; then
RECENT_HANDOFF="$CATALYST_HANDOFF_PATH"
elif [[ -f "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/workflow-context.sh" ]]; then
RECENT_HANDOFF=$("${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/workflow-context.sh" recent handoffs)
fi
if [[ -n "$RECENT_HANDOFF" ]]; then
if [[ "${CATALYST_IS_CONTINUATION:-}" == "true" ]]; then
echo "📋 Continuation worker — resuming from CATALYST_HANDOFF_PATH: $RECENT_HANDOFF"
else
echo "📋 Auto-discovered recent handoff: $RECENT_HANDOFF"
fi
else
echo "⚠️ No recent handoff found in workflow context or filesystem"
fi
```
## Configuration Note
This command uses ticket references like `PROJ-123`. Replace `PROJ` with your Linear team's ticket
prefix:
- Read from `.catalyst/config.json` if available
- Otherwise use a generic format like `TICKET-XXX`
- Examples: `ENG-123`, `FEAT-456`, `BUG-789`
You are tasked with resuming work from a handoff document through an interactive process. These
handoffs contain critical context, learnings, and next steps from previous work sessions that need
to be understood and continued.
## Initial Response
Auto-discovery has already run in Prerequisites above. Check its output and follow this priority:
0. **If `CATALYST_IS_CONTINUATION=true` AND `CATALYST_HANDOFF_PATH` is set** (CTL-484
continuation-worker contract from `orchestrate-revive`): the env-var hook in Prerequisites
already selected the handoff. **Skip directly to Step 3 without prompting the user** — this is
a background-dispatched continuation, not an interactive resume. Confirmation gates would
hang the worker.
1. **If user provided a file path as parameter**: Use the provided path (user override). Skip to
Step 3.
2. **If user provided a ticket number (like PROJ-123)**:
- Run `humanlayer thoughts sync` to ensure `thoughts/` is up to date
- Look in `thoughts/shared/handoffs/PROJ-123/` directory
- List all handoffs for that ticket
- If multiple exist, use the most recent (by timestamp in filename `YYYY-MM-DD_HH-MM-SS`)
- If none exist, tell user and wait for input
- Skip to Step 3
3. **If no parameters provided AND Prerequisites output shows a discovered handoff (📋)**:
- Show user the discovered path
- Ask: "**Proceed with this handoff?** [Y/n]"
- If yes: use it and skip to Step 3
- If no: proceed to option 4
4. **If no parameters AND Prerequisites shows no handoff found (⚠️)**:
- List available handoffs from `thoughts/shared/handoffs/`
- Show most recent 5 handoffs with dates
- Ask user which one to use
- Wait for user input with path or ticket number
**STEP 3: Analyze the handoff**
Once you have a handoff path:
- Read the handoff document FULLY (no limit/offset)
- Immediately read any research or plan documents it references
- Do NOT use sub-agents to read these critical files
- Ingest all context from the handoff
- Propose course of action to user
- Get confirmation before proceeding
## Process Steps
### Step 1: Read and Analyze Handoff
1. **Read handoff document completely**:
- Use the Read tool WITHOUT limit/offset parameters
- Extract all sections:
- Task(s) and their statuses
- Recent changes
- Learnings
- Artifacts
- Action items and next steps
- Other notes
2. **Spawn focused research tasks**: Based on the handoff content, spawn parallel research tasks to
verify current state:
```
Task 1 - Verify recent changes:
Check if the recent changes mentioned in the handoff still exist.
1. Verify files mentioned in "Recent changes" section
2. Check if the described changes are still present
3. Look for any subsequent modifications
4. Identify any conflicts or regressions
Use tools: Read, Grep, Glob
Return: Current state of recent changes with file:line references
```
```
Task 2 - Validate current codebase state:
Verify the current state against what's described in the handoff.
1. Check files mentioned in "Learnings" section
2. Verify patterns and implementations still exist
3. Look for any breaking changes since handoff
4. Identify new related code added since handoff
Use tools: Read, Grep, Glob
Return: Validation results and any discrepancies found
```
```
Task 3 - Gather artifact context:
Read all artifacts mentioned in the handoff.
1. Read feature documents listed in "Artifacts"
2. Read implementation plans referenced
3. Read any research documents mentioned
4. Extract key requirements and decisions
Use tools: Read
Return: Summary of artifact contents and key decisions
```
3. **Wait for ALL sub-tasks to complete** before proceeding
4. **Read critical files identified**:
- Read files from "Learnings" section completely
- Read files from "Recent changes" to understand modifications
- Read any new related files discovered during research
### Step 2: Synthesize and Present Analysis
1. **Present comprehensive analysis**:
```
I've analyzed the handoff from [date] by [researcher]. Here's the current situation:
**Original Tasks:**
- [Task 1]: [Status from handoff] → [Current verification]
- [Task 2]: [Status from handoff] → [Current verification]
**Key Learnings Validated:**
- [Learning with file:line reference] - [Still valid/Changed]
- [Pattern discovered] - [Still applicable/Modified]
**Recent Changes Status:**
- [Change 1] - [Verified present/Missing/Modified]
- [Change 2] - [Verified present/Missing/Modified]
**Artifacts Reviewed:**
- [Document 1]: [Key takeaway]
- [Document 2]: [Key takeaway]
**Recommended Next Actions:**
Based on the handoff's action items and current state:
1. [Most logical next step based on handoff]
2. [Second priority action]
3. [Additional tasks discovered]
**Potential Issues Identified:**
- [Any conflicts or regressions found]
- [Missing dependencies or broken code]
Shall I proceed with [recommended action 1], or would you like to adjust the approach?
```
2. **Get confirmation** before proceeding
### Step 3: Create Action Plan
1. **Use TodoWrite to create task list**:
- Convert action items from handoff into todos
- Add any new tasks discovered during analysis
- Prioritize based on dependencies and handoff guidance
2. **Present the plan**:
```
I've created a task list based on the handoff and current analysis:
[Show todo list]
Ready to begin with the first task: [task description]?
```
### Step 4: Begin Implementation
1. **Start with the first approved task**
2. **Reference learnings from handoff** throughout implementation
3. **Apply patterns and approaches documented** in the handoff
4. **Update progress** as tasks are completed
## CLI Tools
When you need to fetch ticket context from Linear (e.g., reading a ticket referenced in the
handoff), use the Linearis CLI. For exact syntax, run `linearis issues usage` or see
`/catalyst-dev:linearis` — **do not guess commands**.
## Guidelines
1. **Be Thorough in Analysis**:
- Read the entire handoff document first
- Verify ALL mentioned changes still exist
- Check for any regressions or conflicts
- Read all referenced artifacts
2. **Be Interactive**:
- Present findings before starting work
- Get buy-in on the approach
- Allow for course corrections
- Adapt based on current state vs handoff state
3. **Leverage Handoff Wisdom**:
- Pay special attention to "Learnings" section
- Apply documented patterns and approaches
- Avoid repeating mistakes mentioned
- Build on discovered solutions
4. **Track Continuity**:
- Use TodoWrite to maintain task continuity
- Reference the handoff document in commits
- Document any deviations from original plan
- Consider creating a new handoff when done
5. **Validate Before Acting**:
- Never assume handoff state matches current state
- Verify all file references still exist
- Check for breaking changes since handoff
- Confirm patterns are still valid
## Common Scenarios
### Scenario 1: Clean Continuation
- All changes from handoff are present
- No conflicts or regressions
- Clear next steps in action items
- Proceed with recommended actions
### Scenario 2: Diverged Codebase
- Some changes missing or modified
- New related code added since handoff
- Need to reconcile differences
- Adapt plan based on current state
### Scenario 3: Incomplete Handoff Work
- Tasks marked as "in_progress" in handoff
- Need to complete unfinished work first
- May need to re-understand partial implementations
- Focus on completing before new work
### Scenario 4: Stale Handoff
- Significant time has passed
- Major refactoring has occurred
- Original approach may no longer apply
- Need to re-evaluate strategy
## Example Interaction Flow
```
User: /catalyst-dev:resume-handoff specification/feature/handoffs/handoff-0.md
Assistant: Let me read and analyze that handoff document...
[Reads handoff completely]
[Spawns research tasks]
[Waits for completion]
[Reads identified files]
I've analyzed the handoff from [date]. Here's the current situation...
[Presents analysis]
Shall I proceed with implementing the webhook validation fix, or would you like to adjust the approach?
User: Yes, proceed with the webhook validation
Assistant: [Creates todo list and begins implementation]
```Related Skills
create-handoff
Create handoff document for passing work to another session. **ALWAYS use when** the user says 'create a handoff', 'hand this off', 'save progress for later', 'I need to stop here', or when context usage is high (>60%) during implementation and work needs to continue in a fresh session.
write-prod-strategy
Product strategy docs using 7-component framework
strategy-sprint
Create product strategy in 1 day, 1 week, or 1 month timeframes. Progressive strategy development framework.
ralph-wiggum
Devil's advocate PRD/document reviewer with humor and sharp critique
prioritize
Classify PM tasks using LNO Framework (Leverage/Neutral/Overhead) to focus on high-impact work.
prd-review-panel
Multi-agent PRD review (7 perspectives)
prd-draft
Create a PRD (product requirements document) for features and initiatives. Guides through clarifying questions, generates a structured draft with hypothesis, strategic fit, non-goals, success metrics, and rollout plan, then offers multi-agent review. Use when the user asks to create a PRD, product spec, feature spec, requirements doc, or product brief.
launch-checklist
Comprehensive product launch planning
impact-sizing
Quantify feature value with driver trees, confidence levels, and the 4-step sizing framework.
feature-results
Post-launch analysis and results documentation. Document what shipped and what we learned.
expansion-strategy
Upsell, cross-sell, and account growth tactics. Framework for revenue expansion.
define-north-star
Identify and validate your North Star Metric. Aligns product strategy with key business metric.