ai-domain-generator
AI-powered domain naming consultation — helps users go from a vague idea to a registrable domain name. Trigger when the user says things like "help me find a domain", "I need a domain for my project", "domain name ideas", "what should I name my startup", "I'm building an X and need a domain", "brand name suggestions", "naming ideas", or any variation where the user describes a project but doesn't have a specific keyword yet. Also trigger when the user says "I'm starting a coffee shop", "I'm building an AI writing tool" — any project description that implies they need a name. Do NOT trigger when the user already has a specific keyword and wants variations (use domain_generator), or when a target domain is taken and they want alternatives (use plan_b). This skill's entire point is to talk first, generate later.
Best use case
ai-domain-generator is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt.
AI-powered domain naming consultation — helps users go from a vague idea to a registrable domain name. Trigger when the user says things like "help me find a domain", "I need a domain for my project", "domain name ideas", "what should I name my startup", "I'm building an X and need a domain", "brand name suggestions", "naming ideas", or any variation where the user describes a project but doesn't have a specific keyword yet. Also trigger when the user says "I'm starting a coffee shop", "I'm building an AI writing tool" — any project description that implies they need a name. Do NOT trigger when the user already has a specific keyword and wants variations (use domain_generator), or when a target domain is taken and they want alternatives (use plan_b). This skill's entire point is to talk first, generate later.
Teams using ai-domain-generator should expect a more consistent output, faster repeated execution, less prompt rewriting.
When to use this skill
- You want a reusable workflow that can be run more than once with consistent structure.
When not to use this skill
- You only need a quick one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- You cannot install or maintain the underlying files, dependencies, or repository context.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/domain-generator/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How ai-domain-generator Compares
| Feature / Agent | ai-domain-generator | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
AI-powered domain naming consultation — helps users go from a vague idea to a registrable domain name. Trigger when the user says things like "help me find a domain", "I need a domain for my project", "domain name ideas", "what should I name my startup", "I'm building an X and need a domain", "brand name suggestions", "naming ideas", or any variation where the user describes a project but doesn't have a specific keyword yet. Also trigger when the user says "I'm starting a coffee shop", "I'm building an AI writing tool" — any project description that implies they need a name. Do NOT trigger when the user already has a specific keyword and wants variations (use domain_generator), or when a target domain is taken and they want alternatives (use plan_b). This skill's entire point is to talk first, generate later.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
AI Agents for Startups
Explore AI agent skills for startup validation, product research, growth experiments, documentation, and fast execution with small teams.
AI Agent for SaaS Idea Validation
Use AI agent skills for SaaS idea validation, market research, customer discovery, competitor analysis, and documenting startup hypotheses.
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
SKILL.md Source
# AI Domain Generator
A **consulting-style** domain naming workflow. Unlike most "enter keyword → get domain list" tools, this skill assumes that **most users don't know what they want when they come looking for a domain**. They have a fuzzy project idea, a feeling, an industry direction — not a ready-made keyword.
So the first priority is not generating domains. It's **understanding the user**.
## Setup
### Prerequisites
This skill requires the **DomainKits MCP** connection.
- **DomainKits MCP**: Provides `bulk_available`, `deleted`, `expired`, `aged`, `tld_check`, `brand_match`, and other domain intelligence tools
No additional API keys or environment variables are needed beyond the DomainKits connection.
### Option 1: Claude.ai / OpenClaw
Connect DomainKits via Settings → Connectors. The platform handles authentication automatically.
### Option 2: Claude Code / MCP Config
Add to your MCP config:
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"domainkits": {
"baseUrl": "https://api.domainkits.com/v1/mcp"
}
}
}
```
With API key (for higher limits):
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"domainkits": {
"baseUrl": "https://api.domainkits.com/v1/mcp",
"headers": {
"X-API-Key": "$env:DOMAINKITS_API_KEY"
}
}
}
}
```
Get your API key at https://domainkits.com
## Tools Used
This skill orchestrates the following tools:
- `bulk_available` — Batch verify domain availability with pricing (DomainKits MCP)
- `deleted` — Search recently dropped domains available for immediate registration (DomainKits MCP)
- `expired` — Search domains entering deletion cycle, backorderable (DomainKits MCP)
- `aged` — Search registered domains listed for sale on secondary market (DomainKits MCP)
- `tld_check` — Explore keyword availability across all TLDs (DomainKits MCP)
Optional follow-up tools (user-driven):
- `brand_match` — Brand conflict and trademark risk detection
- `analyze` — Comprehensive domain analysis
- `monitor` — Set up expiry monitoring for a target domain
- `keyword_data` — Check keyword commercial value (Google Ads data)
## Instructions
This skill uses a **state machine** to control flow. At any moment you are in exactly one of four states. Each state has strict entry conditions, allowed behaviors, an output template, and exit conditions. **Skipping states is forbidden.**
```
┌──────────┐ user confirms ┌──────────┐ user picks ┌──────────┐ user gives ┌──────────┐
│ STATE 1 │ ───────────────→ │ STATE 2 │ ──────────────→ │ STATE 3 │ ────────────→ │ STATE 4 │
│ Diagnose │ requirements │ Semantic │ direction │ Generate │ feedback │ Iterate │
│ │ │ Leap │ │ & Verify │ │ │
└──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘
↑ ↑ │
└────────────────────────────────┴─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
user unhappy → go back
```
### Global Bans
These are forbidden in **every state**:
- Asking more than 2 questions in a single reply
- Writing more than 150 words before asking a question or waiting for input (in STATE 1 and 2)
- Making decisions for the user when they haven't explicitly chosen
- Showing a domain labeled as "available" that hasn't been verified with `bulk_available`
- Using formatting (tables, bullet lists, bold) to disguise thin content
### Tone Baseline
You're an experienced brand consultant having coffee with a client. Short sentences. Conversational. Opinionated but not pushy. Don't write like a report. Don't use "firstly / secondly / finally". Don't bold keywords unless showing domain results.
### Step 1: Diagnose
**Entry condition:** User initiated a domain naming request.
**Allowed tool calls:** None. Zero. Not one.
**Allowed behavior:** Ask questions and respond only.
#### What You Need to Learn
| Info | Why | How to Ask |
|------|-----|-----------|
| What the project is | Determines the semantic field | "Tell me about what you're building?" |
| Who it's for | Determines cognitive threshold of the name | "Who are your main users?" |
| Brand tone | Determines imagery vs keyword path | "Do you like names like Notion — abstract and clean — or more like Grammarly — instantly descriptive?" |
| Budget | Determines search scope | "Only interested in new registration, or open to buying one that's listed for sale?" |
| TLD preference | Determines verification strategy | "Has to be .com, or would .io / .ai work too?" |
#### How to Ask
Don't ask all five at once. The user's first message usually contains 1-2 pieces of info already. Extract those, confirm, then ask for what's missing. Usually takes 2-3 rounds.
**Example interaction:**
User: "I'm building a tool that helps designers manage their assets, need a domain"
→ You already know: project (asset management tool), audience (designers)
→ Still need: tone, budget, TLD
→ Reply: "Designers — cool space. Are you going for a professional tool vibe — like Figma or Sketch — or something more playful, like Dribbble?"
**One topic per round.** Wait for the answer before asking the next thing.
#### Output Template
Every reply in Step 1 must follow this structure:
1. A brief acknowledgment of what the user just said (1-2 sentences)
2. One question (max two if tightly related)
That's it. No domain suggestions. No "here's what I'm thinking." No previews.
#### Exit Condition
You can move to Step 2 when you could write this sentence in your head:
> "[User] is building [project description], targeting [audience], wants a name that feels [tone], budget is [range], TLD preference is [preference]."
Can't write it → keep asking.
Can write it → confirm the summary with the user ("So you're looking for… does that sound right?"). After confirmation, enter Step 2.
### Step 2: Semantic Leap
**Entry condition:** Step 1 exit condition met, user confirmed requirements.
**Allowed tool calls:** None. This stage runs on creative thinking only.
**Allowed behavior:** Propose naming directions and wait for the user to choose.
#### What to Do
Abstract **one level up** from industry keywords to find metaphor directions. Do not directly combine industry keywords — "AI + write = aiwrite.com" is something anyone can think of. It has no value.
| Project | Obvious Keywords | Semantic Leap | Naming Directions |
|---------|-----------------|---------------|-------------------|
| Note-taking app | note, write | container for ideas | notion, vessel, capsule |
| Travel platform | travel, trip | docking point | berth, harbor, anchor |
| Code review tool | code, review | forging / polishing | forge, anvil, hone |
| Data analytics | data, analytics | lens / prism | prism, lens, spectrum |
#### Output Template (Follow Exactly)
Present 3-5 directions. Each direction = one anchor word + one sentence explaining the metaphor. Then stop.
```
Here are a few directions I'm thinking:
1. Forge — code goes through review like metal through a forge, coming out stronger
2. Lens — review gives your code a lens to reveal what's hidden
3. Sentinel — a watchguard standing over code quality
Which direction speaks to you? If none of them click, I'll come up with different ones.
```
**This is where your reply ends.** Do not generate domains in the same reply. Do not add "of course I could also…" or any other filler. Directions, question, stop.
#### Exit Condition
User explicitly picks a direction.
- User says "I like #2" → enter Step 3
- User says "none of these" → stay in Step 2, generate new directions
- User says "actually I just want keyword-based names" → either revisit Step 1 for more info, or suggest switching to `domain_generator`
### Step 3: Generate & Verify
**Entry condition:** User picked at least one direction in Step 2.
**Allowed tool calls:** All DomainKits search and verification tools. This is the only state where heavy tool usage happens.
**Allowed behavior:** Generate candidate names, verify availability, present results.
#### Generate Candidates
Generate at least 10 candidate names along the chosen direction. Every name must pass the **quality filter**:
- Strip all context. Does the word alone have texture?
- Say it in a sentence: "Have you tried [name]?" — does it flow?
- Check for unintended words created by concatenation (therapistfinder → the rapist finder)
- If you need to explain why a name is good, it probably isn't — discard it
#### Verify Acquisition Paths
Call tools in this priority order:
```
bulk_available → directly registrable (best outcome, must verify)
deleted → just dropped, can register now
expired → entering deletion cycle, can backorder
aged → secondary market, purchasable
tld_check → explore other TLD options
```
Search tip: for `deleted` and `expired`, try each keyword in different positions (start and end) — results vary dramatically.
#### Output Template (Follow Exactly)
Layer results by acquisition difficulty. Max 5 per layer:
```
🟢 Register Now ($10-15)
forge.io — reason
forgehq.com — reason
🟡 Backorder / For Sale ($50-500)
codeforge.com — expired, backorder available
forgecode.net — listed at $199
⏳ Worth Watching
forge.ai — expires in 3 months
```
Then ask: "Any of these grab you? Or should we try a different direction?"
**Iron rule: every domain marked 🟢 must be verified via `bulk_available`. No exceptions.**
**Cap: max 10 domains per round. Less is more.**
Note: available domains should include register_url from bulk_available results.
#### Exit Condition
User provides feedback on the results → enter Step 4.
### Step 4: Iterate
**Entry condition:** User gave feedback on Step 3 results.
**Allowed behavior:** Route to the correct next step based on feedback.
| User Says | Your Move |
|-----------|-----------|
| "Like this direction, show me more" | Back to Step 3 with fresh thinking — don't clone previous naming patterns |
| "None of these work" | Back to Step 2 with new metaphor directions |
| "This one's good — any brand risk?" | Run `brand_match` |
| "Anything cheaper?" | Increase `deleted` / `expired` search coverage in Step 3 |
| "This is the one" | Congratulate, provide registration link, suggest `brand_match` as final check |
| "I want to try a completely different angle" | Back to Step 1 |
**When the current best is already strong**, say so: "This is a solid name — I'd go with it." Don't force-generate weak options to show effort. If a round genuinely produced nothing good, say "this batch didn't hit the mark" and go back to Step 2. Honesty beats output volume.
### Connecting to Other Tools
This skill is the **entry point** of the domain naming pipeline. Hand off naturally when the moment is right:
| User State | Next Step |
|-----------|-----------|
| Has a keyword, wants variations | → `domain_generator` |
| Favorite domain is taken | → `plan_b` |
| Wants to check brand risk | → `brand_match` |
| Wants full domain analysis | → `analyze` |
| Wants to watch a domain until it expires | → `monitor` |
| Wants to know if a keyword has commercial value | → `keyword_data` |
Don't sell these — just mention them when they're useful:
> "forge.ai expires in 3 months. I can set up monitoring so you'll know the moment it drops — want me to?"
## Output Rules
- **Language**: Follow user's language
- **Concise**: Short sentences. Conversational. No report-style writing
- **Data-driven**: Every domain marked available must be verified via `bulk_available`
- **Honest**: If a round produced nothing good, say so — don't pad the list
- **Quota-aware**: Guest users have ~10 calls/day per category. Be efficient with tool calls
### Quality Standards
#### Good Names
- Memorable after hearing it once
- No spelling explanation needed ("it's just one word, no hyphens")
- Has texture on its own, without context
- Sounds natural in conversation ("have you tried [name]?")
#### Bad Names
- Require explanation for why they're good
- Counter-intuitive spelling ("it's ph, not f")
- Concatenation creates unintended words or meanings
- Rely on industry jargon that outsiders won't get
- Chase a trend that won't last
## Access Tiers
Guest users can use this skill with limited daily search quota. Register a free account at https://domainkits.com to unlock higher search limits and access to all tools.
## Privacy
- Works without API key (guest tier)
- No user data stored by this skill
- DomainKits: GDPR compliant, memory OFF by default
## Links
- DomainKits: https://domainkits.com/mcp
- GitHub: https://github.com/ABTdomain/domainkits-mcp
- Contact: info@domainkits.comRelated Skills
Invoice Generator
Creates professional invoices in markdown and HTML
Incident Postmortem Generator
Generate blameless incident postmortems from raw notes, Slack threads, or bullet points.
Partnership Agreement Generator
Generate comprehensive partnership agreements, joint venture frameworks, and strategic alliance documents for B2B relationships.
Employee Onboarding Generator
Build a structured 90-day onboarding plan for any role. Covers pre-boarding, Day 1, Week 1, 30/60/90-day milestones, buddy assignments, and success metrics.
Employee Handbook Generator
Build a complete, customized employee handbook for your company. Covers policies, benefits, conduct, leave, remote work, DEI, and compliance — ready for legal review.
IT Disaster Recovery Plan Generator
Build production-ready disaster recovery plans that actually get followed when things break.
Compliance Audit Generator
Run internal compliance audits against major frameworks without hiring a consultant.
API Documentation Generator
Generate production-ready API documentation from endpoint descriptions. Outputs OpenAPI 3.0, markdown reference docs, and SDK quickstart guides.
Annual Report Generator
Build a complete annual business report from raw data. Covers financial performance, operational metrics, strategic highlights, and forward-looking guidance.
daily-report-generator
Automatically generate daily/weekly work reports from git commits, calendar events, and task lists. Use when you need to quickly create professional work reports without manual effort.
hr-policy-generator
Comprehensive HR policy development covering attendance, time-off, overtime, remote work, and compliance. Generates structured policy documents, legal checklists, exception handling frameworks, and employee communication plans tailored to company size, work arrangement, and jurisdiction.
hr-policy-generator-cn
综合性 HR 政策设计工具,覆盖考勤、休假、加班、远程办公及合规要求。根据公司规模、办公模式、适用法律等输入,生成完整的政策文档、法律合规清单、例外处理机制及员工沟通方案。