swiftui-view-refactor
Refactor SwiftUI views into smaller components with stable, explicit data flow.
Best use case
swiftui-view-refactor is best used when you need a repeatable AI agent workflow instead of a one-off prompt. It is especially useful for teams working in multi. Refactor SwiftUI views into smaller components with stable, explicit data flow.
Refactor SwiftUI views into smaller components with stable, explicit data flow.
Users should expect a more consistent workflow output, faster repeated execution, and less time spent rewriting prompts from scratch.
Practical example
Example input
Use the "swiftui-view-refactor" skill to help with this workflow task. Context: Refactor SwiftUI views into smaller components with stable, explicit data flow.
Example output
A structured workflow result with clearer steps, more consistent formatting, and an output that is easier to reuse in the next run.
When to use this skill
- Use this skill when you want a reusable workflow rather than writing the same prompt again and again.
When not to use this skill
- Do not use this when you only need a one-off answer and do not need a reusable workflow.
- Do not use it if you cannot install or maintain the related files, repository context, or supporting tools.
Installation
Claude Code / Cursor / Codex
Manual Installation
- Download SKILL.md from GitHub
- Place it in
.claude/skills/swiftui-view-refactor/SKILL.mdinside your project - Restart your AI agent — it will auto-discover the skill
How swiftui-view-refactor Compares
| Feature / Agent | swiftui-view-refactor | Standard Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Platform Support | Not specified | Limited / Varies |
| Context Awareness | High | Baseline |
| Installation Complexity | Unknown | N/A |
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill do?
Refactor SwiftUI views into smaller components with stable, explicit data flow.
Where can I find the source code?
You can find the source code on GitHub using the link provided at the top of the page.
Related Guides
AI Agents for Coding
Browse AI agent skills for coding, debugging, testing, refactoring, code review, and developer workflows across Claude, Cursor, and Codex.
Best AI Skills for Claude
Explore the best AI skills for Claude and Claude Code across coding, research, workflow automation, documentation, and agent operations.
Cursor vs Codex for AI Workflows
Compare Cursor and Codex for AI coding workflows, repository assistance, debugging, refactoring, and reusable developer skills.
SKILL.md Source
# SwiftUI View Refactor
## Overview
Refactor SwiftUI views toward small, explicit, stable view types. Default to vanilla SwiftUI: local state in the view, shared dependencies in the environment, business logic in services/models, and view models only when the request or existing code clearly requires one.
## When to Use
- When cleaning up a large SwiftUI view or splitting long `body` implementations.
- When you need smaller subviews, explicit dependency injection, or better Observation usage.
## Core Guidelines
### 1) View ordering (top → bottom)
- Enforce this ordering unless the existing file has a stronger local convention you must preserve.
- Environment
- `private`/`public` `let`
- `@State` / other stored properties
- computed `var` (non-view)
- `init`
- `body`
- computed view builders / other view helpers
- helper / async functions
### 2) Default to MV, not MVVM
- Views should be lightweight state expressions and orchestration points, not containers for business logic.
- Favor `@State`, `@Environment`, `@Query`, `.task`, `.task(id:)`, and `onChange` before reaching for a view model.
- Inject services and shared models via `@Environment`; keep domain logic in services/models, not in the view body.
- Do not introduce a view model just to mirror local view state or wrap environment dependencies.
- If a screen is getting large, split the UI into subviews before inventing a new view model layer.
### 3) Strongly prefer dedicated subview types over computed `some View` helpers
- Flag `body` properties that are longer than roughly one screen or contain multiple logical sections.
- Prefer extracting dedicated `View` types for non-trivial sections, especially when they have state, async work, branching, or deserve their own preview.
- Keep computed `some View` helpers rare and small. Do not build an entire screen out of `private var header: some View`-style fragments.
- Pass small, explicit inputs (data, bindings, callbacks) into extracted subviews instead of handing down the entire parent state.
- If an extracted subview becomes reusable or independently meaningful, move it to its own file.
Prefer:
```swift
var body: some View {
List {
HeaderSection(title: title, subtitle: subtitle)
FilterSection(
filterOptions: filterOptions,
selectedFilter: $selectedFilter
)
ResultsSection(items: filteredItems)
FooterSection()
}
}
private struct HeaderSection: View {
let title: String
let subtitle: String
var body: some View {
VStack(alignment: .leading, spacing: 6) {
Text(title).font(.title2)
Text(subtitle).font(.subheadline)
}
}
}
private struct FilterSection: View {
let filterOptions: [FilterOption]
@Binding var selectedFilter: FilterOption
var body: some View {
ScrollView(.horizontal, showsIndicators: false) {
HStack {
ForEach(filterOptions, id: \.self) { option in
FilterChip(option: option, isSelected: option == selectedFilter)
.onTapGesture { selectedFilter = option }
}
}
}
}
}
```
Avoid:
```swift
var body: some View {
List {
header
filters
results
footer
}
}
private var header: some View {
VStack(alignment: .leading, spacing: 6) {
Text(title).font(.title2)
Text(subtitle).font(.subheadline)
}
}
```
### 3b) Extract actions and side effects out of `body`
- Do not keep non-trivial button actions inline in the view body.
- Do not bury business logic inside `.task`, `.onAppear`, `.onChange`, or `.refreshable`.
- Prefer calling small private methods from the view, and move real business logic into services/models.
- The body should read like UI, not like a view controller.
```swift
Button("Save", action: save)
.disabled(isSaving)
.task(id: searchText) {
await reload(for: searchText)
}
private func save() {
Task { await saveAsync() }
}
private func reload(for searchText: String) async {
guard !searchText.isEmpty else {
results = []
return
}
await searchService.search(searchText)
}
```
### 4) Keep a stable view tree (avoid top-level conditional view swapping)
- Avoid `body` or computed views that return completely different root branches via `if/else`.
- Prefer a single stable base view with conditions inside sections/modifiers (`overlay`, `opacity`, `disabled`, `toolbar`, etc.).
- Root-level branch swapping causes identity churn, broader invalidation, and extra recomputation.
Prefer:
```swift
var body: some View {
List {
documentsListContent
}
.toolbar {
if canEdit {
editToolbar
}
}
}
```
Avoid:
```swift
var documentsListView: some View {
if canEdit {
editableDocumentsList
} else {
readOnlyDocumentsList
}
}
```
### 5) View model handling (only if already present or explicitly requested)
- Treat view models as a legacy or explicit-need pattern, not the default.
- Do not introduce a view model unless the request or existing code clearly calls for one.
- If a view model exists, make it non-optional when possible.
- Pass dependencies to the view via `init`, then create the view model in the view's `init`.
- Avoid `bootstrapIfNeeded` patterns and other delayed setup workarounds.
Example (Observation-based):
```swift
@State private var viewModel: SomeViewModel
init(dependency: Dependency) {
_viewModel = State(initialValue: SomeViewModel(dependency: dependency))
}
```
### 6) Observation usage
- For `@Observable` reference types on iOS 17+, store them as `@State` in the owning view.
- Pass observables down explicitly; avoid optional state unless the UI genuinely needs it.
- If the deployment target includes iOS 16 or earlier, use `@StateObject` at the owner and `@ObservedObject` when injecting legacy observable models.
## Workflow
1. Reorder the view to match the ordering rules.
2. Remove inline actions and side effects from `body`; move business logic into services/models and keep only thin orchestration in the view.
3. Shorten long bodies by extracting dedicated subview types; avoid rebuilding the screen out of many computed `some View` helpers.
4. Ensure stable view structure: avoid top-level `if`-based branch swapping; move conditions to localized sections/modifiers.
5. If a view model exists or is explicitly required, replace optional view models with a non-optional `@State` view model initialized in `init`.
6. Confirm Observation usage: `@State` for root `@Observable` models on iOS 17+, legacy wrappers only when the deployment target requires them.
7. Keep behavior intact: do not change layout or business logic unless requested.
## Notes
- Prefer small, explicit view types over large conditional blocks and large computed `some View` properties.
- Keep computed view builders below `body` and non-view computed vars above `init`.
- A good SwiftUI refactor should make the view read top-to-bottom as data flow plus layout, not as mixed layout and imperative logic.
- For MV-first guidance and rationale, see `references/mv-patterns.md`.
## Large-view handling
When a SwiftUI view file exceeds ~300 lines, split it aggressively. Extract meaningful sections into dedicated `View` types instead of hiding complexity in many computed properties. Use `private` extensions with `// MARK: -` comments for actions and helpers, but do not treat extensions as a substitute for breaking a giant screen into smaller view types. If an extracted subview is reused or independently meaningful, move it into its own file.
## Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.Related Skills
comprehensive-review-full-review
Use when working with comprehensive review full review
code-review-ai-ai-review
You are an expert AI-powered code review specialist combining automated static analysis, intelligent pattern recognition, and modern DevOps practices. Leverage AI tools (GitHub Copilot, Qodo, GPT-5, C
code-refactoring-tech-debt
You are a technical debt expert specializing in identifying, quantifying, and prioritizing technical debt in software projects. Analyze the codebase to uncover debt, assess its impact, and create acti
cc-skill-security-review
This skill ensures all code follows security best practices and identifies potential vulnerabilities. Use when implementing authentication or authorization, handling user input or file uploads, or creating new API endpoints.
vibers-code-review
Human review workflow for AI-generated GitHub projects with spec-based feedback, security review, and follow-up PRs from the Vibers service.
tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor
Use when working with tdd workflows tdd refactor
swiftui-ui-patterns
Apply proven SwiftUI UI patterns for navigation, sheets, async state, and reusable screens.
swiftui-performance-audit
Audit SwiftUI performance issues from code review and profiling evidence.
swiftui-liquid-glass
Implement or review SwiftUI Liquid Glass APIs with correct fallbacks and modifier order.
swiftui-expert-skill
Write, review, or improve SwiftUI code following best practices for state management, view composition, performance, and iOS 26+ Liquid Glass adoption. Use when building new SwiftUI features, refactoring existing views, reviewing code quality, or adopting modern SwiftUI patterns.
requesting-code-review
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
receiving-code-review
Code review requires technical evaluation, not emotional performance.